The European Space Agency (ESA) built Proba-2, a small satellite, to test new space technology and to observe the Sun. Its orbit avoids eclipses, the periods when Earth blocks the Sun, for more than nine months of each year.
The body is a box, 0.6 by 0.6 by 0.8 m, built around honeycomb panels, which are light sandwiches with a cellular core. Temperature control is passive wherever possible. Some outer surfaces are painted black to radiate heat to cold space, others white to absorb less sunlight.
Application
An ESA small-satellite mission that tests new space technology while observing the Sun from a Sun-synchronous orbit. It is a flown example of how a small, mostly passively cooled spacecraft is built.
Photos
How it is built
Honeycomb panels
Three honeycomb panels are arranged in an H, and a bottom panel connects the satellite to its launch vehicle. The outer panels are honeycomb too. The three panels that carry solar cells, two of them folding out, have an aluminium honeycomb core under carbon-fibre skins.
H-configuration inner panels (3)
Bottom panel (launch vehicle interface)
Outer panels without cells
Two deployable panels and one fixed outer panel
Power
Gallium arsenide solar cells sit on those three panels. At the end of the planned two-year mission they supply at most 110 W, while the spacecraft uses between 70 and 110 W. A 16.5 Ah lithium-ion battery takes over during eclipses.
Solar cells
Battery
Instruments and thruster
The LYRA instrument comes in a machined box of aluminium alloy 6082 T6, 315 mm by 92.5 mm by 220 mm, and weighs 4.9 kg in all. SWAP, the other named instrument, cools its detector with a passive radiator. The thruster uses xenon gas as propellant.
LYRA instrument box
Where the parts areNumber of parts we have listed in each group
The materials by familyHow many of the parts that name a material use each one
Aluminium7
Semiconductors1
Other1
How it connects to other things
Proba-2 is one of ESA's Proba missions. It went into orbit on a Rockot rocket from Plesetsk, Russia, as a secondary passenger on the launch of SMOS. APCO supplied its structure.
Aluminium honeycomb core. Here: H-configuration inner panels (3); Outer panels without cells and more. There: Interstage; Fairing shell (aluminium honeycomb with carbon fibre face sheets).
Aluminium. Here: TPMU/DSLP housing. There: Tank domes (aluminium).
lithium-ion. Here: Battery. There: Batteries and solar cells.
What we do not know
Only two instruments, LYRA and SWAP, are named. ESA does not give the fasteners, adhesives, insulation films or paint products, or the materials of the thruster and its tank. It is not clear whether the inner panels have aluminium or carbon-fibre skins.
The detailed data
What is written above is built from these numbers and quotes. Each row links to the page it was taken from. Get all of it as JSON, or ask our MCP server.
Features
Thermal control mostly passive
SWAP uses a passive radiator
Specifications
What
Value
Dimensions
0.6 x 0.6 x 0.8 m
Mass
130 kg nominal
Orbit
Sun-synchronous, almost circular
Eclipse
eclipse-free more than nine months per year
Launch vehicle/site
Rockot from Plesetsk, Russia
Power generation
up to 110 W at end of nominal mission
Power consumption
70-110 W
Battery
16.5 Ah lithium-ion
Lifetime
two years nominal
Instruments named
LYRA and SWAP
Propellant
xenon
Materials in detail
Each material named in the sources: where it is used here, which other products use it, and its key numbers when its material page exists.
Aluminium honeycomb core (Hexcel HexWeb CR III, 5052 and 5056)
ESA names the H-structure panels, outer panels, solar panels and the LYRA box with materials, but gives no fasteners, adhesives, coatings or panel part numbers.
TPMU + DSLP, Institute of Atmospheric Physics (CAS)
Standards named
Aluminum alloy 6082 T6 (designation) · LYRA box; no specification number cited
What the sources leave out
No fasteners, inserts, adhesives, MLI films, paint product names, SWAP instrument materials, or thruster/tank materials are published on the pages read. Which of the two sources is right on the inner-panel skins (aluminium vs CFRP) is not resolved. No standards are cited for materials.