In short
Tianhe sits at the centre of the three-module, T-shaped Tiangong station, a programme run by the China Manned Space Agency. It is used as living quarters, a control centre and a docking hub for the crewed Shenzhou ships and the Tianzhou cargo ships. It also supplies power, life support and propulsion to the other modules.
The frame is 5A06 aluminium alloy, and two flexible solar wings of gallium arsenide cells provide power. Four electric Hall thrusters running on xenon gas supplement the chemical thrusters. Inside, the life-support system distils urine into water and reacts carbon dioxide with hydrogen to make methane and water.
What the sources leave out
No primary CMSA source with materials was found; the 5A06 frame comes from eoPortal and a hobbyist report. The silicon-cell claim is from China Space Report and its stated efficiency (over 30%) is doubtful for silicon, so treat it as low confidence. Pressure shell, window, thermal blanket, radiator, thruster and cabling materials are not stated. Mass is quoted as 22,000 kg (eoPortal) versus 22,500 kg elsewhere. More detail: Not found in public sources: pressure-shell wall and MMOD shield design for Tianhe (the only debris-protection source is station-level add-on devices fitted on spacewalks, module not named); official Hall-thruster maker, model and specific impulse (CAST paper gives only 4 x 80 mN and xenon; Guokr names an 'LT-100', an analyst thread names 'HET-80' from a Shanghai institute, neither is an official CMSA/CASC statement, and the 'LHT-100' of Lanzhou Institute of Physics appears only in an unrelated 2016 IAC abstract for the XX-2 satellite, so no supplied_by row was written for the thrusters); chemical engine models, thrust and propellant (the 26-thruster count, 4 orbit plus 22 attitude, and the MMH/N2O4 guess come only from an analyst thread by Dongfang Hour on Twitter/X and are unofficial); suppliers of the CMGs, computers, docking mechanisms, ECLSS hardware, cameras and radiators; radiator area; materials other than the 5A06 frame already in the entry (the gallium arsenide cells and lithium-ion cells are stated only generically; the solar-wing 'thin light composite' cover is from a translated key-data table). The CAST paper (Wang et al. 2023, Space: Science & Technology) states triple-junction gallium arsenide cells at 30% efficiency, which contradicts the 'silicon' cell row already in the entry. Discrepancies: wing length 12.6 m (CAST paper) versus 'more than 12 m' (repost) versus 13 m (Guokr); arm elbow cameras one (Xinhua) versus two (Guokr); separation 492 s versus 490 s; launch mass 22,500 kg (China Daily, SpaceNews) versus 22,000 kg (eoPortal); eoPortal expands CAST as 'China Association for Science and Technology' when it credits the arm, but Xinhua and CASC pages show CAST is the China Academy of Space Technology, so the eoPortal supplier claim was not used. The CAST design paper is cited through a copy hosted at newspaceeconomy.ca because the publisher page returns 403. The resource cabin is described as unpressurised by eoPortal and CAST says only 'resource cabin', so only the node cabin and life control cabin are treated as the pressurised shell. Docking partners (Shenzhou, Tianzhou, Wentian, Mengtian) are recorded as docking-port components and not as relation rows because none of the allowed relation types fits a docking partner. Station-level items not tied to Tianhe alone (add-on debris devices, 110 m3 activity space, orbit band, design life) are labelled as station-level. More detail: Not found in public sources: Tianhe pressure-shell wall and MMOD shield design (the only debris-protection reports are station-level add-on devices fitted on spacewalks, module not named); official Hall-thruster maker, model and specific impulse (the CAST paper gives only 4 x 80 mN and xenon; Guokr names an 'LT-100' and an analyst thread names 'HET-80' from a Shanghai institute, neither an official CMSA or CASC statement; the 'LHT-100' of Lanzhou Institute of Physics appears only in an unrelated 2016 IAC abstract for the XX-2 satellite, so no supplied_by row was written for the thrusters); chemical engine models, thrust and propellant (the 26-thruster count, 4 orbit plus 22 attitude, and the MMH/N2O4 guess come only from an analyst thread by Dongfang Hour on Twitter/X and are unofficial); suppliers of the CMGs, computers, docking mechanisms, life-support hardware, cameras and radiators; radiator area; materials other than the 5A06 frame already in the entry (gallium arsenide and lithium-ion cells are stated only generically; the solar-wing 'thin light composite' cover comes from a translated key-data table). The CAST paper (Wang et al. 2023, Space: Science & Technology) states triple-junction gallium arsenide cells at 30% efficiency, which contradicts the 'silicon' cell row already in the entry. Discrepancies: wing length 12.6 m (CAST paper) versus 'more than 12 m' (repost) versus 13 m (Guokr); arm elbow cameras one (Xinhua) versus two (Guokr); separation at 492 s versus 490 s; launch mass 22,500 kg (China Daily, SpaceNews) versus 22,000 kg (eoPortal); eoPortal expands CAST as 'China Association for Science and Technology' when it credits the arm, but Xinhua and CASC pages show CAST is the China Academy of Space Technology, so the eoPortal supplier claim was not used. The CAST design paper is cited through a copy hosted at newspaceeconomy.ca because the publisher page returns 403. eoPortal puts the engines, tanks and power system in an unpressurised service compartment around the large column segment and resource cabin; the pressurised versus unpressurised split of the resource cabin is not given, and the node cabin diameter is not published in the sources found. eoPortal says the module has two pairs of solar wings, while CAST and CGTN pages describe two wings (67 m2 each). Docking partners (Shenzhou, Tianzhou, Wentian, Mengtian) are recorded in the docking-port components because none of the allowed relation types fits a docking partner. Station-level figures (orbit band, design life, 110 m3 activity space, CMG accuracy, 30% cell efficiency) are labelled as station-level.
Maker credit: China Manned Space Agency (CMSA). Collected from public pages and documents, checked 4 Nov 2026.