Aluminium alloy 2319 2319

Al-Cu-Mn-Zr-Ti-V alloy, AA 2319 / AWS ER2319 filler: Cu 5.8 to 6.8, Mn 0.20 to 0.40, Zr 0.10 to 0.25, Ti 0.10 to 0.20, V 0.05 to 0.15, Fe max 0.30, Si max 0.20, Zn max 0.10, Mg max 0.02, other elements max 0.15 wt%, Al balance

Also known as UNS A92319, EN name AlCu6MnZrTi, AA 2319, AMS 4191, ISO S Al 2319

2319 (AA 2319, UNS A92319, welding filler AWS ER2319) is an aluminium-copper alloy with 5.8 to 6.8 % copper and small additions of manganese, zirconium, titanium and vanadium.

8 sources · Updated 2026-10-26 · CC BY 4.0

Evidence level

2 of 5

Lab-measured

Weld metal strength

269 MN/m2 tensile (deposit)

Filler at room temperature

160 MPa tensile (approximate)

Weight

2.84 g/cm3

Recipe, share of the weight

  • Al not statedAluminium
  • Cu not statedCopper
  • Mn not statedManganese
  • Zr not statedZirconium
  • Ti not statedTitanium
  • V not statedVanadium

Best for

Welding 2219 and other Al-Cu aerospace structures and propellant tankage, where the weld is made with MIG or TIG wire (AircraftMaterials; NASA TM X-64659)

Weakest at

Weld strength. In the 1972 NASA TIG study, welds made with M-934 filler were 7 to 18 percent stronger than 2319 welds at ambient temperature.

Risk at a glance

  • People Low. Dust and fume warnings
  • If it fails Moderate. Weld strength below the best filler
  • Corrosion No data. No corrosion data recorded

Quick facts: 2319

Key properties of 2319
PropertyValueBasis
Density2.84 g/cm³2 sourced values across conditions
Yield strength70 to 117 MPa2 sourced values across conditions
Tensile strength160 to 269 MPa2 sourced values across conditions
Melting point543 to 643 °C1 sourced value

What is the density of Aluminium alloy 2319?

Aluminium alloy 2319 has a density of 2.84 g/cm³. The range covers 2 sourced values across the tempers, forms and test conditions the sources report; room-temperature values are used where a source states a temperature.

What is the melting point of Aluminium alloy 2319?

Aluminium alloy 2319 has a melting point of 543 to 643 °C. The source and test conditions are listed in the properties table on this page.

What is the yield strength of Aluminium alloy 2319?

Aluminium alloy 2319 has a yield strength of 70 to 117 MPa. The range covers 2 sourced values across the tempers, forms and test conditions the sources report; room-temperature values are used where a source states a temperature.

What is the tensile strength of Aluminium alloy 2319?

Aluminium alloy 2319 has a tensile strength of 160 to 269 MPa. The range covers 2 sourced values across the tempers, forms and test conditions the sources report; room-temperature values are used where a source states a temperature.

What are the other names and codes for Aluminium alloy 2319?

Aluminium alloy 2319 is also written as UNS A92319, EN name AlCu6MnZrTi, AA 2319, AMS 4191, ISO S Al 2319. Each code is printed in the source listed beside it in the designations table.

What is Aluminium alloy 2319 used for?

Uses recorded in the sources include Welding filler for 2219 and other Al-Cu aerospace structures (MIG and TIG wire and rods); TIG-welded propellant tankage built from 2219 with 2319 filler.

Why it exists

2319 is the aluminium-copper filler that NASA's 1972 TIG study tested for 2219-T87 welds, and it is listed as the filler for 2219 in aerospace structures. The study describes the TIG process with 2219 base alloy and 2319 filler as consistent with aerospace hardware such as propellant tankage. Wikipedia notes that 2219 was used for the Space Shuttle Standard Weight Tank, but it does not name 2319 for that tank.

Where it's used

Aerospace welds in 2219 and other Al-Cu structures

AircraftMaterials says 2319 was developed for use with Alloy 2219 in high-strength structural and aircraft applications, as MIG and TIG wire and rods.

TIG-welded propellant tankage

NASA TM X-64659 lists propellant tankage as aerospace hardware built with TIG welding, 2219 base alloy and 2319 filler, and says 2219 was the prime structural material for the S-IC propellant tanks.

Recipe

Al-Cu-Mn-Zr-Ti-V alloy, AA 2319 / AWS ER2319 filler: Cu 5.8 to 6.8, Mn 0.20 to 0.40, Zr 0.10 to 0.25, Ti 0.10 to 0.20, V 0.05 to 0.15, Fe max 0.30, Si max 0.20, Zn max 0.10, Mg max 0.02, other elements max 0.15 wt%, Al balance

2319 is an Al-Cu-Mn-Zr-Ti-V welding alloy, supplied as solid wire and rod for MIG and TIG welding (AircraftMaterials). Its composition is the standard filler range, not a measured value. The wire is surface cleaned to remove metalworking lubricants (AircraftMaterials).

What 2319 is made of
IngredientShare of the weightWhat it does
Aluminium Al not stated The matrix of the filler. Balance of the composition.
Copper Cu not stated The main alloying element (Wikipedia; AircraftMaterials). The datasheets call 2319 heat treatable.
Manganese Mn not stated Alloying element named in the composition limits.
Zirconium Zr not stated Alloying element named in the composition limits (Wikipedia; AircraftMaterials).
Titanium Ti not stated Alloying element named in the composition limits.
Vanadium V not stated Alloying element named in the composition limits.

Weight shares are as printed in the sources.

What it can do

Weld metal strength

269 MN/m2 tensile (deposit)

measured

In the NASA TIG study, the 2319 all-weld-metal deposit printed 269 MN/m2 tensile strength, 117 MN/m2 yield and 18.0 % elongation at 25.6 °C, as welded.

Filler at room temperature

160 MPa tensile (approximate)

measured

The MasterWeld listing gives approximate values of 160 MPa tensile, 70 MPa yield and 12 % elongation at 20 °C, without a weld condition.

Weight

2.84 g/cm3

measured

The AircraftMaterials weld properties give a density of 2.84 g/cm3. Wikipedia gives 2840 kg/m3.

How it compares

2319 is a filler, so the sources here compare it with other fillers in welds rather than with other wrought aluminium alloys. The 1972 NASA study found M-934 welds stronger than 2319 welds at ambient temperature, by 7 to 18 percent. The sources read here give no numeric comparison with wrought grades.

The same measurements for each material, so you can compare them. Each row names the key condition under the value; the full conditions and methods are in the numbered notes under Technical details. Other materials are shown beside it; each was measured under its own conditions, so open its page before comparing closely. Compare every grade in the family.

Benchmarks
Measurement231960617075-T6202450525XXX2195 (Al-Cu-Li)Al10502011201420172017A22192618A300331034047501950565083AlMg2AlMg36013606360826101AA7050AA8011Au-Al IMCsAl master alloys
Thermal behavior and safety
Melting range, 2319543 to 643 °C3no data532 °Cno data607.2 to 649 °Cno data1020 degF660 °C645 to 657 °C540 °C535 °C510 °C510 °C543 °C549 °C655 °C655 °C1068 to 1080 °F575 to 630 °C565 to 640 °C570 °C605 to 650 °C590 to 645 °C579 °C600 °C575 °C1090 °F490 °C640 to 655 °Cno data880 °C
Physical and electrical
Density, 2319 filler (weld properties)2.84 g/cm³12.7 g/cm³2.8 Mg/m32.78 g/cc2.68 g/cc2.68 g/cm³0.096 lb/in32.7 g/cm³2.71 g/cm³2.82 g/cm³2.82 g/cm³2.79 g/cm³2.79 g/cm³2.84 g/cm³2.76 g/cm³2.73 g/cm³2.73 g/cm³2.65 g/cm³2.64 g/cm³2.64 g/cm³2.65 g/cm³2.69 g/cm³2.67 g/cm³2.71 g/cm³2700 kg/m32.7 g/cm³0.097 lb/cu.in2.83 g/cm³2.71 g/cm³no datano data
Density, 2319 (cross-check)2840 kg/m322.7 g/cm³2.8 Mg/m32.78 g/cc2.68 g/cc2.68 g/cm³0.096 lb/in32.7 g/cm³2.71 g/cm³2.82 g/cm³2.82 g/cm³2.79 g/cm³2.79 g/cm³2.84 g/cm³2.76 g/cm³2.73 g/cm³2.73 g/cm³2.65 g/cm³2.64 g/cm³2.64 g/cm³2.65 g/cm³2.69 g/cm³2.67 g/cm³2.71 g/cm³2700 kg/m32.7 g/cm³0.097 lb/cu.in2.83 g/cm³2.71 g/cm³no datano data
Weld hardness, 2319 filler122 to 153 HV4no datano datano datano datano datano datano datano datano datano datano datano datano datano datano data46 HVno datano datano datano datano datano datano datano datano datano datano datano datano datano data
Other measurements
Yield strength Rp0.2, 2319 filler wire (approximate)70 MPa5276 MPa503 MPa324 MPa13 ksi193 MPa74 ksi29 MPa> 85 MPa140 MPa> 400 MPa276 MPa276 MPa> 50 ksi350 MPa50 MPa> 110 MPa55 MPano datano data> 125 MPa> 120 MPa> 80 MPa350 MPa21 ksi> 255 MPa28000 psi> 414 MPano datano datano data
Tensile strength Rm, 2319 filler wire (approximate)160 MPa6310 MPa572 MPa469 MPa28 ksi228 MPa80 ksi88 MPa105 to 145 MPa300 MPa> 460 MPa427 MPa427 MPa> 62 ksi420 MPa110 MPa> 140 MPa124 MPa270 to 350 MPa300 MPa275 to 350 MPa190 to 230 MPa190 to 260 MPa410 MPa27 ksi> 300 MPa32000 psi> 483 MPa180 to 195 MPano datano data
Elongation A5, 2319 filler wire (approximate)12 %717 %11 %19 %25 %12 %8 %50 to 65 %4 to 8 %16 %> 6 %18 %18 %> 6 %> 5 %25 %> 8 %12 %> 2 %20 %> 12 %4 to 12 %> 12 %4 %8 %> 9 %> 8 %> 7 %> 1 %no datano data
Tensile strength, 2319 all-weld-metal deposit, as welded, 25.6 °C269 MN/m28310 MPa572 MPa469 MPa28 ksi228 MPa80 ksi88 MPa105 to 145 MPa300 MPa> 460 MPa427 MPa427 MPa> 62 ksi420 MPa110 MPa> 140 MPa124 MPa270 to 350 MPa300 MPa275 to 350 MPa190 to 230 MPa190 to 260 MPa410 MPa27 ksi> 300 MPa32000 psi> 483 MPa180 to 195 MPano datano data
Yield strength 0.2 % offset, 2319 all-weld-metal deposit, as welded, 25.6 °C117 MN/m29276 MPa503 MPa324 MPa13 ksi193 MPa74 ksi29 MPa> 85 MPa140 MPa> 400 MPa276 MPa276 MPa> 50 ksi350 MPa50 MPa> 110 MPa55 MPano datano data> 125 MPa> 120 MPa> 80 MPa350 MPa21 ksi> 255 MPa28000 psi> 414 MPano datano datano data
Elongation, 2319 all-weld-metal deposit, as welded, 25.6 °C18 %1017 %11 %19 %25 %12 %8 %50 to 65 %4 to 8 %16 %> 6 %18 %18 %> 6 %> 5 %25 %> 8 %12 %> 2 %20 %> 12 %4 to 12 %> 12 %4 %8 %> 9 %> 8 %> 7 %> 1 %no datano data

Why choose it, and why not

Good for

  • Welding 2219 and other Al-Cu aerospace structures, where the sources name 2319 as the filler.
  • Propellant tankage welded by TIG, as described in the NASA 1972 study.

Watch out for

  • Weld strength: in the 1972 NASA study, M-934 filler welds were 7 to 18 percent stronger than 2319 welds at ambient temperature.
  • Weld yield: the as-welded deposit printed 117 MN/m2 yield against 269 MN/m2 tensile.
  • Gaps: no thermal, electrical or 2319-specific corrosion value was found in the sources read.
  • Condition: the approximate filler values (160 MPa, 70 MPa, 12 %) do not state the weld condition.

2319 is a copper-rich aluminium welding filler for 2219 and other Al-Cu aerospace structures. Its weld values are sound but not the strongest choice in the 1972 NASA study, and the sources here give no thermal, electrical or 2319-specific corrosion data.

Technical details

For scientists and researchers. Everything above comes from the record below: every number with its method, its conditions and its source.

Other names and standards

The same grade under other systems, as datasheets and standards print them. Each code was checked against the page it comes from.

Other names and standards
SystemCodes
UNSA92319
EN nameAlCu6MnZrTi
AA2319
AMS4191
ISOS Al 2319 (EN ISO 18273 filler designation)

Notes

The method, full conditions and any caveat for the numbered rows above.

Notes for the numbered rows
#MeasurementMethodConditionsCaveat
1Density, 2319 filler (weld properties)Value printed in the Weld Properties section of the AircraftMaterials datasheet as 2.84 gm/cc, restated in g/cm3 (same number)condition in source not statedunit in source gm/cc—
2Density, 2319 (cross-check)Value printed in the Wikipedia lead paragraph, which cites it to the Aluminum Association Teal Sheetscondition in source not stated—
3Melting range, 2319Range printed in the Weld Properties section of the AircraftMaterials datasheetcondition in source not stated—
4Weld hardness, 2319 fillerRange printed as Hardness range in the Weld Properties section of the AircraftMaterials datasheet; the page prints no test load or weld conditiontest load not statedcondition in source not stated—
5Yield strength Rp0.2, 2319 filler wire (approximate)Approximate value printed in the physical properties table of the MasterWeld MW-2319 page, at 20 °C; the page does not state the weld conditionproduct 2319 welding wire (filler)temperature 20 °Cbasis approximate valuesweld condition not stated—
6Tensile strength Rm, 2319 filler wire (approximate)Approximate value printed in the physical properties table of the MasterWeld MW-2319 page, at 20 °C; the page does not state the weld conditionproduct 2319 welding wire (filler)temperature 20 °Cbasis approximate valuesweld condition not stated—
7Elongation A5, 2319 filler wire (approximate)Approximate value printed in the physical properties table of the MasterWeld MW-2319 page, at 20 °Cproduct 2319 welding wire (filler)temperature 20 °Cgauge length A5 (Lo = 5d0)basis approximate valuesweld condition not stated—
8Tensile strength, 2319 all-weld-metal deposit, as welded, 25.6 °CTensile result printed in NASA TM X-64659, Table VI, for all-weld-metal specimens; it describes the weld deposit made in that test set-upproduct all-weld-metal deposit of 2319 filler, TIG, 6.35 mm 2219-T87 plate (a weld deposit, not a wrought product)temperature +78 °F (+25.6 °C)weld condition as welded, no post-weld treatmenttravel speed 15.25 cm/min carriage speedparent alloy 2219-T87—
9Yield strength 0.2 % offset, 2319 all-weld-metal deposit, as welded, 25.6 °CYield result printed in NASA TM X-64659, Table VI, for all-weld-metal specimens (column YS, footnote YS at 0.2 percent offset)product all-weld-metal deposit of 2319 filler, TIG, 6.35 mm 2219-T87 plate (a weld deposit, not a wrought product)temperature +78 °F (+25.6 °C)weld condition as welded, no post-weld treatmenttravel speed 15.25 cm/min carriage speedparent alloy 2219-T87offset 0.2 percent—
10Elongation, 2319 all-weld-metal deposit, as welded, 25.6 °CElongation result printed in NASA TM X-64659, Table VI, for all-weld-metal specimensproduct all-weld-metal deposit of 2319 filler, TIG, 6.35 mm 2219-T87 plate (a weld deposit, not a wrought product)temperature +78 °F (+25.6 °C)weld condition as welded, no post-weld treatmenttravel speed 15.25 cm/min carriage speedparent alloy 2219-T87gauge length not read (the El footnote was not extracted)—

Corrosion and compatibility

What happens when it meets other materials and environments.

Corrosion and compatibility
EnvironmentConcernWhat happens
3.5 % NaCl solution, alternate immersion (10 minutes in each hour), up to 90 days or failure, at 75 % of the yield strength applied stress not rated The 1972 NASA study reports no significant stress-corrosion penalty for the substitute fillers compared with the 2319 baseline. It gives no 2319 failure count in the text read.1
Corrosion details
#EnvironmentDetailsTest conditions
1 3.5 % NaCl solution, alternate immersion (10 minutes in each hour), up to 90 days or failure, at 75 % of the yield strength applied stress The specimens were TIG welds of 2219-T87 sheet with 2014 or M-934 filler, compared with 2319 filler welds. The report says no significant deleterious effect came from either substitute filler, and it refers to Tables IX and X for the results. Those tables could not be read reliably from the PDF text layer, so no 2319-specific result is recorded here. basis qualitative comparison of weld specimens, not a wrought producttest alternate immersion in 3 1/2 percent NaCl, 75 % of yield applied stress, 90 days or until failure

Risks and side effects

Hazards to people, what happens when a cell overheats, and how the material is handled and stored.

For people

The Hydro safety data sheet for the 2xxx series gives dust, fume and environmental warnings for processing. No health data for the 2319 filler were found.

Welding and machining dust
Metallic dust can ignite or explode, and fumes from welding or machining can cause metal fume fever (Hydro SDS, 2xxx series).
Environment
Small chips, fine turnings and processing dust may be toxic to aquatic life, and the copper content adds an aquatic hazard class (H400, H412) in the same family-level sheet.

If it fails

The failure routes found in the sources are weaker welds with 2319 than with other fillers, and low yield margin in the as-welded weld metal.

Welds
In the 1972 NASA TIG study on 2219-T87, welds with M-934 filler were 7 to 18 percent stronger than 2319 welds at ambient temperature.
Weld metal yield
The as-welded all-weld-metal deposit printed 117 MN/m2 yield against 269 MN/m2 tensile at 25.6 °C.
Stress corrosion
The 1972 NASA study reports no significant deleterious effect from the substitute fillers in 3.5 % NaCl alternate immersion. No 2319-specific result was recorded.

Handling and storage

Specify the filler and the form
Name the filler (2319 or ER2319) and whether it is wire or rod, because the weld strengths depend on the filler and the welding process.
Dust control
Keep grinding and machining dust under control, and avoid breathing dust or fume, following the Hydro SDS.

Test details
The original wording and numbers from the sources, for readers who want them.

Failure risks

Failure risks
FailureTrigger and consequence
Weld strength below the best fillermoderate severityTIG welding of 2219-T87 with 2319 filler, compared with M-934 filler in the 1972 NASA studyThe study summary says welds with M-934 filler were 7 to 18 percent stronger than 2319 welds in ultimate and yield strength at ambient temperature. In that study 2319 was the baseline, not the strongest filler.
Low yield margin in as-welded weld metalmoderate severityAll-weld-metal deposit with 2319 filler, as welded, with no post-weld treatmentAt 25.6 °C the printed yield value (117 MN/m2) is about 43 % of the printed tensile value (269 MN/m2). The weld metal therefore has little yield margin, so the weld design must check weld metal, not the parent alloy.

Handling and storage

  • Keep grinding and machining dust and fines under control. The Hydro sheet says that metallic dust may ignite or explode and that product dust is combustible. It says to avoid breathing dust or fume (P260). For aluminium it prints OSHA PEL 15 mg/m3 total dust and 5 mg/m3 respirable, and NIOSH REL 10 mg/m3 total dust and 5 mg/m3 respirable.
  • The supplier says the wire is surface cleaned to remove standard metalworking lubricants. Specify the filler (for example, 2319 ER2319 for TIG or MIG) and the form (wire or rod) when ordering.

Supply and geography

How common the raw materials are and where they come from.

Primary aluminium smelter production, 2025 estimate (world)

Top producers (2025)
China 60.8%, India 5.7%, Russia 5.3%, Canada 4.5%, United Arab Emirates 3.6%
Recycling
USGS: in 2025 about 3.6 million tons of aluminum were recovered from purchased scrap in the United States, about 56 % from new scrap and 44 % from old scrap. Old-scrap recovery was equivalent to about 28 % of apparent consumption.
Substitutes
USGS: composites can substitute for aluminum in aircraft fuselages and wings. Copper can replace aluminum in electrical and heat-exchange applications.

Copper refinery production, 2025 estimate (world), the main alloying element at 5.8 to 6.8 %

Top producers (2025)
China 48.3%, Congo (Kinshasa) 9.7%, Chile 5.9%
Critical mineral lists
US: listed