Cerium(IV) oxide CeO2
CeO2 · CAS 1306-38-3 · cubic, Fm-3m (fluorite)
Cerium(IV) oxide (ceria, CeO2) is a pale-yellow oxide with a cubic fluorite crystal structure.
Evidence level
2 of 5
Lab-measured
- 0Predicted only. No one has made it, or no measurement exists.
- 1Calculated. Only calculated or predicted values from sources.
- 2Lab-measured. Measured properties with their conditions stated.
- 3Space-relevant tests. Measured in conditions relevant to space, such as vacuum or atomic oxygen.
- 4Ground-qualified. Qualified for an application on the ground.
- 5Flown or field-proven. Flight or field results exist.
Radiation tolerance
1.5 percent ceria
UV absorption
Over 92 percent transmittance, UV-A to NIR
Melting point
2600 degC
Recipe, share of the weight
- Ce not statedCerium
- O not statedOxygen
Best for
Radiation-resistant and UV-absorbing cover glass (NASA reports on 1.5 percent ceria-doped Micro-Sheet; SCHOTT describes a cerium-doped cover glass)
Weakest at
Hazard classification in the NITE entry (H371 and H372, lung effects from repeated exposure, signal word Danger), and no space-flight record for pure CeO2
Risk at a glance
- People Low. Hazard classification depends on the notifier
- If it fails High. Lung damage from repeated inhalation of dust
- Corrosion Low. Ceria doping greatly reduces the radiation darkening that undoped cover glass shows.
Quick facts: CeO2
| Property | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Density | 7.65 g/cm³ | 1 sourced value |
| Thermal expansion (CTE) | 11.6 ppm/K | 1 sourced value |
| Melting point | 2,600 °C | 1 sourced value |
What is the density of Cerium(IV) oxide (CeO2)?
Cerium(IV) oxide (CeO2) has a density of 7.65 g/cm³. The source and test conditions are listed in the properties table on this page.
What is the coefficient of thermal expansion of Cerium(IV) oxide (CeO2)?
Cerium(IV) oxide (CeO2) has a coefficient of thermal expansion of 11.6 ppm/K. The source and test conditions are listed in the properties table on this page.
What is the melting point of Cerium(IV) oxide (CeO2)?
Cerium(IV) oxide (CeO2) has a melting point of 2,600 °C. The source and test conditions are listed in the properties table on this page.
What is Cerium(IV) oxide (CeO2) used for?
Uses recorded in the sources include Solar-cell cover glass made from ceria-doped Micro-Sheet (NASA ground study of radiation effects); Commercial cerium-doped solar cell cover glass (SCHOTT).
Why it exists
Cerium(IV) oxide is a stable, insoluble oxide that is useful because cerium can switch between two oxidation states. That switch lets ceria store and release oxygen, so it helps catalysts and it lets ceria absorb ultraviolet light when doped. NASA used it in cover glass because small amounts of ceria stop the glass from browning under electron radiation. Doped ceria also conducts oxide ions well at high temperature, which is why it is studied as a fuel-cell electrolyte.
Where it's used
Solar-cell cover glass
NASA Langley found in 1970 and 1973 that 1.5 percent ceria in Micro-Sheet cover glass resists radiation darkening far better than undoped glass. SCHOTT now sells a cerium-doped cover glass and claims over 92 percent transmittance across the UV-A to near-infrared range. Both are ground or manufacturer evidence, not flight results for pure CeO2.
Catalysts and catalytic converters
A 2021 review describes ceria, alone or with noble metals, as the oxygen store in three-way catalytic converters. It converts CO and hydrocarbons to CO2 and H2O and NOx to N2. The review also reports CeO2 catalysts for CO2 conversion and VOC removal.
Solid oxide fuel cell electrolytes
Gadolinia-doped ceria is studied as an electrolyte for intermediate and low temperature solid oxide fuel cells. A 2024 study reports grain-boundary ionic conductivity of 0.104 S/cm at 700 degC for the 15 mol percent Gd composition, with an activation energy of 0.81 eV.
Recipe
CeO2
CeO2 is cerium(IV) oxide. Each formula unit combines one cerium atom with two oxygen atoms. In air, cerium metal oxidizes to CeO2, which takes a fluorite crystal structure.
| Ingredient | Share of the weight | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| Cerium Ce | not stated | The metal centre. Cerium sits in the +4 state in CeO2. Switching between Ce4+ and Ce3+ lets the oxide store and release oxygen, which is the basis of its catalytic use. |
| Oxygen O | not stated | Eight-coordinate cerium is surrounded by oxygen anions on the tetrahedral 8c sites of the fluorite lattice. |
Weight shares are as printed in the sources.
What it can do
Radiation tolerance
1.5 percent ceria
Doping cover glass with about 1.5 percent ceria keeps the glass clear under electron radiation. The authors said the ceria glass was comparable to synthetic fused silica for many space missions.
UV absorption
Over 92 percent transmittance, UV-A to NIR
SCHOTT's cerium-doped cover glass is designed to protect against UV while passing the rest of the spectrum. The figure is a manufacturer claim for the glass, not pure CeO2.
Melting point
2600 degC
The PubChem record gives a melting point of 2600 degC, which puts ceria well above the working range of any polymer or metal in the collection.
How it compares
CeO2 is a dense, high-melting oxide with fluorite structure. Its melting point and density are printed in PubChem as 2600 degC and 7.65 g/cm3. Its expansion coefficient is about 11.6 ppm/K, close to other oxides in the ceramic group. Its main space case is as a dopant that protects glass from radiation darkening, not as a structural or thermal material.
The same measurements for each material, so you can compare them. Each row names the key condition under the value; the full conditions and methods are in the numbered notes under Technical details. Other materials are shown beside it; each was measured under its own conditions, so open its page before comparing closely. Compare every grade in the family.
| Measurement | CeO2 | Al2O3 | BaTiO3 | BeO | CaTiO3 | RCF | CoO and Co3O4 | CuO, Cu2O | HfO2 | Fe2O3, Fe3O4 | LSM | PZT | MgO | NiO | Nb2O5 | Al2Si4O10(OH)2 | Ln2O3 | SiO | MgO-SiO2 | SnO2, ITO | TiO2 | WO3 | V2O5 | Y2O3 | ZnO | Mg-PSZ, ATZ, ZTA | YSZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity and energy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Activation energy, grain-boundary ionic conduction, 15 mol % gadolinia-doped ceria | 0.81 eV5 | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data |
| Thermal behavior and safety | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| melting point | 2600 °C1 | 2030 to 2072 °C | 1625 °C | 2578 °C | 1975 °C | 1760 °C | 1830 °C | 1326 °C | 2774 °C | no data | no data | no data | 2800 °C | 1984 °C | 1500 °C | no data | 2304 °C | 1702 °C | no data | 1630 °C | 1850 °C | 1472 °C | 690 °C | 2410 °C | 1975 °C | no data | no data |
| Physical and electrical | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Density | 7.65 g/cm³2 | 3.72 g/cm³ | 6.08 - | 3.01 g/cu cm | 4.1 g/cc | 64 kg/m3 | 6.45 g/cm³ | 6 - | 9.68 g/cc | 5.24 g/cm³ | 2 g/cm³ | 7.8 g/cm³ | 3.58 g/cm³ | 6.67 g/cm³ | 4.6 g/cm³ | 2.3 g/cc | 6.51 g/cm³ | 2.13 g/cc | 2.8 g/cm³ | 6.95 g/mL | 4 g/cm³ | 7.2 g/cm³ | 3.4 - | > 4.9 g/cm³ | 5.67 g/cm³ | 5.72 g/cm³ | 6.02 g/cm³ |
| Grain-boundary ionic conductivity, 15 mol % gadolinia-doped ceria | 0.104 S/cm4 | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data |
| Relative density of gadolinia-doped ceria pellets | 98 % of theoretical6 | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data |
| Other measurements | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Molecular weight, CeO2 | 172.1 g/mol3 | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | 265.8 g/mol | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | 181.9 g/mol | no data | no data | no data | no data |
| Transmittance of a cerium-doped solar cell cover glassManufacturer statement on its product page | > 92 %7 | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data |
| Ceria dopant level in the 1973 test glass | 1.5 % by weight8 | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data |
| Optimum ceria dopant level, cover glass | 1 to 2 % by weight9 | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data |
| Wideband transmission loss after 1 MeV electrons, undoped cover glass, single-coated | 3.85 %10 | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data |
| Wideband transmission loss after 1 MeV electrons, undoped cover glass, double-coated | 3.6 %11 | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data |
| Linear coefficient of thermal expansion, experimental | 11.6 ppm/K12 | 8.2 ppm/K | 15.7 ppm/K | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data | 9.2 to 13.3 10-6/K | no data | -6 to -4 10^-6/K | 10.8 ppm/K | no data | no data | 4 to 5 ppm/K | no data | no data | 7.7 ppm/K | no data | no data | no data | no data | 7.2 ppm/K | no data | 10.2 ppm/K | 10.3 ppm/K |
Why choose it, and why not
Good for
- Radiation-resistant cover glass. NASA's 1970 and 1973 tests found ceria-doped glass much less prone to browning under electron radiation than undoped glass.
- Oxygen storage in catalysts. The 2021 review describes ceria as the oxygen store in three-way catalytic converters.
Watch out for
- Repeated inhalation of dust. PubChem's NITE classification lists H372 (Category 1, lung) with the signal word Danger.
- Most of the space evidence is for ceria as a dopant in glass. No flight result for pure CeO2 was found.
- The electrolyte figures are for gadolinia-doped ceria, not pure CeO2.
CeO2 earns its place in space work as a dopant that protects cover glass from radiation darkening. As a pure oxide it has useful melting point and density data, but the hazard entry for dust and the lack of pure-material flight data mean it should be treated as a proven dopant, not a stand-alone structural material.
Technical details
For scientists and researchers. Everything above comes from the record below: every number with its method, its conditions and its source.
Notes
The method, full conditions and any caveat for the numbered rows above.
| # | Measurement | Method | Conditions | Caveat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | melting point | Database value, read from the PubChem record for CID 73963 | basis value in PubChem Experimental Properties, from the PAC Chemical Database (U.S. Department of Energy)form CeO2 (ceria) | — |
| 2 | Density | Database value, read from the PubChem record for CID 73963 | temperature 25 °Cform CeO2 (ceria) | — |
| 3 | Molecular weight, CeO2 | Computed property read from the PubChem property table (REST API) | basis computed by PubChem from the molecular formula | — |
| 4 | Grain-boundary ionic conductivity, 15 mol % gadolinia-doped ceria | Impedance spectroscopy (EIS) between 350 and 700 °C, as reported in the abstract | composition Gd0.15Ce0.85O2-delta (15 mol % Gd3+)temperature 700 °Catmosphere aircomponent grain boundary | Doped ceria, not pure CeO2. The abstract gives this as the highest value across the compositions tested. |
| 5 | Activation energy, grain-boundary ionic conduction, 15 mol % gadolinia-doped ceria | Arrhenius fit of the impedance data, as reported in the abstract | composition Gd0.15Ce0.85O2-delta (15 mol % Gd3+)component grain boundary | — |
| 6 | Relative density of gadolinia-doped ceria pellets | Field-emission SEM observation, as reported in the abstract (around 98 percent) | composition Gd_x Ce_(1-x) O2-delta (0 to 20 mol % Gd), co-precipitated nanoparticles | — |
| 7 | Transmittance of a cerium-doped solar cell cover glass | — | product SCHOTT cerium-doped solar cell cover glass (glass, not pure CeO2)spectral range UV-A to near-infrared | A manufacturer claim. The page gives no test method or sample thickness. |
| 8 | Ceria dopant level in the 1973 test glass | Composition of the test glass as stated by the authors | host Micro-Sheet solar-cell cover glassaddition ceria added during the melting process | — |
| 9 | Optimum ceria dopant level, cover glass | Range stated as optimum by the authors of the 1970 NASA note | host solar-cell cover glass (frequently used Micro-Sheet type)irradiation 1 MeV electrons to 5 x 10^14 e/cm2 and 22 MeV protons to 10^13 p/cm2 | — |
| 10 | Wideband transmission loss after 1 MeV electrons, undoped cover glass, single-coated | Wideband transmission measured before and after electron irradiation | glass undoped solar-cell cover glass, single-coated (antireflection only)reference undoped glass used for comparison with the ceria glass | Reference value for undoped glass, not a ceria value. The 1.5 percent ceria glass lost much less (the report calls the loss very small without printing a figure in the text read). |
| 11 | Wideband transmission loss after 1 MeV electrons, undoped cover glass, double-coated | Wideband transmission measured before and after electron irradiation | glass undoped solar-cell cover glass, double-coated (antireflection and UV reflection)reference undoped glass used for comparison with the ceria glass | Reference value for undoped glass, not a ceria value. |
| 12 | Linear coefficient of thermal expansion, experimental | Quoted by the paper as the experimental value, set against its own simulated value (1.05 x 10^-5 K^-1). Converted from 1.16 x 10^-5 K^-1 to 11.6 ppm/K. | basis experimental value quoted by an arXiv paper for CeO2; temperature range not stated in the text readunit in source 1.16 x 10^-5 K^-1 | — |
Corrosion and compatibility
What happens when it meets other materials and environments.
| Environment | Concern | What happens |
|---|---|---|
| Electron radiation at space-representative energies (laboratory, 1 MeV electrons) | low | Ceria doping greatly reduces the radiation darkening that undoped cover glass shows.1 |
| Ultraviolet exposure of a glass cover (doped ceria) | low | Dopants added to ceria are reported to raise its chemical stability and UV absorption.2 |
| Water and humid air | low | CeO2 is insoluble in water. No humidity or corrosion test on ceria was found.3 |
| Hydrogen at high temperature (reducing gas) | low | Hydrogen reduces CeO2 powder at high temperature, forming nonstoichiometric ceria.4 |
| # | Environment | Details | Test conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Electron radiation at space-representative energies (laboratory, 1 MeV electrons) | Undoped Micro-Sheet cover glass browned under 1 MeV electrons and lost 3.85 percent (single-coated) and 3.60 percent (double-coated) of wideband transmission. The 1.5 percent ceria-doped glass lost very little by comparison, and the authors found that a 5.0 percent ceria glass gave no significant further gain at the thickness tested. | exposure 1 MeV electron irradiation in the laboratorymaterial 1.5 percent ceria Micro-Sheet cover glassnote ceria here is a dopant inside the glass, not a CeO2 layer |
| 2 | Ultraviolet exposure of a glass cover (doped ceria) | The review says that adding dopants to ceria can enrich its thermal and chemical stability and give strong ultraviolet absorption. It gives no exposure time or dose, so the statement is qualitative. | basis general review statement on doped ceria, no exposure test |
| 3 | Water and humid air | The Merck Index entry reproduced in PubChem describes CeO2 as white (pure) to pale-yellow crystals that are insoluble in water. No humidity exposure or corrosion test on ceria was read, so the rating reflects solubility only. | basis qualitative solubility statementexposure not tested in the sources read |
| 4 | Hydrogen at high temperature (reducing gas) | The review reports hydrogen as a reducing agent for CeO2 powders at high temperature and at atmospheric pressure. Nonstoichiometric ceria (CeO2-y) then stores oxygen. The passage read gives no temperature, rate or reversal behaviour for this reaction. | basis literature statement in the review, no test conditions given |
Risks and side effects
Hazards to people, what happens when a cell overheats, and how the material is handled and stored.
For people
Most company reports to PubChem's ECHA record say CeO2 is not classified, but the NITE entry carries a lung-damage warning with the signal word Danger.
- The powder
- PubChem's ECHA record gives 565 of 651 company reports as not meeting GHS hazard criteria. 86 reports list hazard codes.
- Repeated exposure
- The NITE classification lists H372 (repeated exposure, lung, Category 1) and H371 (single exposure, lung, Category 2). Keep dust out of breathing zones.
- Precautions
- The NITE entry lists precautionary codes P260, P264, P270, P308+P316, P319, P405 and P501 (codes only, without their full wording).
Radiation and cover glass
These results come from NASA ground tests of glass, not from flight.
- Undoped glass
- Undoped cover glass browned under 1 MeV electrons and lost 3.85 percent of wideband transmission (single-coated) and 3.60 percent (double-coated).
- Ceria-doped glass
- A 1.5 percent ceria glass lost much less, and the authors judged the loss very small. Going to 5.0 percent gave no significant further benefit at the thickness tested.
Handling and storage
- Hydrogen
- Hydrogen reduces CeO2 powder at high temperature to nonstoichiometric ceria. The review gives no temperature or rate for this reaction.
Test details
The original wording and numbers from the sources, for readers who want them.
Failure risks
| Failure | Trigger and consequence |
|---|---|
| Lung damage from repeated inhalation of dusthigh severity | Repeated or prolonged inhalation of airborne ceria dust in handlingThe NITE classification lists H372 (Category 1, lung) and H371 (Category 2, lung), with signal word Danger. The effect is a health hazard for people, not a failure of the material in service. |
| Radiation darkening of undoped cover glassmoderate severity | 1 MeV electron irradiation of undoped solar-cell cover glassUndoped glass browns and loses 3.85 percent (single-coated) to 3.60 percent (double-coated) of wideband transmission. The authors say this loss would need to be designed out by overdesigning the solar array. |
| Loss of oxygen to nonstoichiometric cerialow severity | Reducing gas such as hydrogen at high temperatureCeO2 gives up oxygen and forms CeO2-y with oxygen vacancies. This changes the redox and ion-transport behaviour that the material is used for in catalysts and electrolytes. |
Handling and storage
- PubChem lists the precautionary codes P260, P264, P270, P308+P316, P319, P405 and P501 for the NITE classification. The record gives the codes only, not the full wording.
Mitigations
- Dope the cover glass with ceria at 1 to 2 percent by weight. The 1970 NASA note calls this the optimum range, and the 1973 note found that 5.0 percent gave no significant further gain.
Supply and geography
How common the raw materials are and where they come from.
Cerium (rare earths group, USGS 2025 mine production, rare-earth oxide equivalent)
Not read in a source opened for this profile
- Top producers (2025)
- China 69.2%, United States 13.1%, Australia 7.4%, Burma 5.6%, Thailand 1.2%
- Critical mineral lists
- US: listed, EU: not listed
- Recycling
- USGS: limited quantities of rare earths were recovered from batteries, permanent magnets and fluorescent lamps. The chapter does not single out cerium oxide.
- Substitutes
- USGS: substitutes are available for many rare-earth applications but generally are less effective.
Documents
Datasheets, safety data sheets, papers and standards you can open.
Full record
The complete spore, as stored. Free to reuse under CC-BY-4.0. Images keep the licence shown with each one.
Show the full YAML
spore: profile
id: cerium-oxide
spore_version: 0.2
family: oxide-ceramics
name: Cerium(IV) oxide
abbreviation: CeO2
role: oxygen-storage oxide, UV-absorbing dopant and radiation-resistant cover-glass additive
category: ceramics
type: oxides
summary: |
Cerium(IV) oxide (ceria, CeO2) is a pale-yellow oxide with a cubic fluorite crystal structure. PubChem's record, drawn from the U.S. Department of Energy PAC Chemical Database, gives a melting point of 2600 degC and a density of 7.65 g/cm3 at 25 degC. Ceria is best known as a catalyst and oxygen store, and as a dopant. NASA Langley found in 1970 and 1973 that adding about 1.5 percent ceria to solar-cell cover glass made the glass much less prone to darkening under 1 MeV electrons than undoped glass. Gadolinia-doped ceria, a related material, reached 0.104 S/cm of grain-boundary ionic conductivity at 700 degC in a 2024 study.
best_for: Radiation-resistant and UV-absorbing cover glass (NASA reports on 1.5 percent ceria-doped Micro-Sheet; SCHOTT describes a cerium-doped cover glass)
weakest_at: Hazard classification in the NITE entry (H371 and H372, lung effects from repeated exposure, signal word Danger), and no space-flight record for pure CeO2
identity:
formula: CeO2
cas: 1306-38-3
crystal_system: cubic
space_group: Fm-3m (fluorite)
source: pmc-ceria-review-2021
where: Introduction, cubic fluorite lattice with Fm-3m space group and oxygen on the 8c sites; CAS number and molecular formula from PubChem CID 73963
tags:
environments: []
stresses:
- total-radiation-dose
- uv
applications:
- solar-arrays
- radiation-shielding
properties:
- benchmark: melting_point
value: 2600
unit: °C
scope: material
conditions:
basis: value in PubChem Experimental Properties, from the PAC Chemical Database (U.S. Department of Energy)
form: CeO2 (ceria)
method: Database value, read from the PubChem record for CID 73963
status: ground
source: pubchem-ceria
where: Chemical and Physical Properties, Experimental Properties, Melting Point (reference 24)
- benchmark: density
value: 7.65
unit: g/cm3
scope: material
conditions:
temperature: 25 °C
form: CeO2 (ceria)
method: Database value, read from the PubChem record for CID 73963
status: ground
source: pubchem-ceria
where: Chemical and Physical Properties, Experimental Properties, Density (reference 24)
- benchmark: molecular_weight
label: Molecular weight, CeO2
value: 172.115
unit: g/mol
scope: material
conditions:
basis: computed by PubChem from the molecular formula
method: Computed property read from the PubChem property table (REST API)
status: calculated
source: pubchem-mw
where: Computed Properties, Molecular Weight
- benchmark: ionic_conductivity
label: Grain-boundary ionic conductivity, 15 mol % gadolinia-doped ceria
value: 0.104
unit: S/cm
scope: material
conditions:
composition: Gd0.15Ce0.85O2-delta (15 mol % Gd3+)
temperature: 700 °C
atmosphere: air
component: grain boundary
method: Impedance spectroscopy (EIS) between 350 and 700 °C, as reported in the abstract
status: ground
note: Doped ceria, not pure CeO2. The abstract gives this as the highest value across the compositions tested.
source: gdc-sci-rep-2024
where: Abstract
- benchmark: activation_energy
label: Activation energy, grain-boundary ionic conduction, 15 mol % gadolinia-doped ceria
value: 0.81
unit: eV
scope: material
conditions:
composition: Gd0.15Ce0.85O2-delta (15 mol % Gd3+)
component: grain boundary
method: Arrhenius fit of the impedance data, as reported in the abstract
status: ground
source: gdc-sci-rep-2024
where: Abstract
- benchmark: density_relative_to_theoretical
label: Relative density of gadolinia-doped ceria pellets
value: 98
unit: '% of theoretical'
scope: material
conditions:
composition: Gd_x Ce_(1-x) O2-delta (0 to 20 mol % Gd), co-precipitated nanoparticles
method: Field-emission SEM observation, as reported in the abstract (around 98 percent)
status: ground
source: gdc-sci-rep-2024
where: Abstract
- benchmark: transmittance
label: Transmittance of a cerium-doped solar cell cover glass
value: 92
bound: lower
unit: '%'
scope: material
conditions:
product: SCHOTT cerium-doped solar cell cover glass (glass, not pure CeO2)
spectral_range: UV-A to near-infrared
method: Manufacturer statement on its product page
status: ground
note: A manufacturer claim. The page gives no test method or sample thickness.
source: schott-ceria-glass
where: Product description, first section on the cerium-doped cover glass
- benchmark: dopant_level
label: Ceria dopant level in the 1973 test glass
value: 1.5
unit: '% by weight'
scope: material
conditions:
host: Micro-Sheet solar-cell cover glass
addition: ceria added during the melting process
method: Composition of the test glass as stated by the authors
status: ground
source: nasa-tn-d7245
where: Abstract; Introduction (ceria doping to a level of 1.5 percent made part of the melting process)
- benchmark: dopant_level
label: Optimum ceria dopant level, cover glass
value: 1
value_high: 2
bound: range
unit: '% by weight'
scope: material
conditions:
host: solar-cell cover glass (frequently used Micro-Sheet type)
irradiation: 1 MeV electrons to 5 x 10^14 e/cm2 and 22 MeV protons to 10^13 p/cm2
method: Range stated as optimum by the authors of the 1970 NASA note
status: ground
source: nasa-tn-1971
where: Summary
- benchmark: wideband_transmission_loss
label: Wideband transmission loss after 1 MeV electrons, undoped cover glass, single-coated
value: 3.85
unit: '%'
scope: material
conditions:
glass: undoped solar-cell cover glass, single-coated (antireflection only)
reference: undoped glass used for comparison with the ceria glass
method: Wideband transmission measured before and after electron irradiation
status: ground
note: Reference value for undoped glass, not a ceria value. The 1.5 percent ceria glass lost much less (the report calls the loss very small without printing a figure in the text read).
source: nasa-tn-d7245
where: Results, text on undoped glass and Table II
- benchmark: wideband_transmission_loss
label: Wideband transmission loss after 1 MeV electrons, undoped cover glass, double-coated
value: 3.6
unit: '%'
scope: material
conditions:
glass: undoped solar-cell cover glass, double-coated (antireflection and UV reflection)
reference: undoped glass used for comparison with the ceria glass
method: Wideband transmission measured before and after electron irradiation
status: ground
note: Reference value for undoped glass, not a ceria value.
source: nasa-tn-d7245
where: Results, text on undoped glass and Table II
- benchmark: cte
label: Linear coefficient of thermal expansion, experimental
value: 11.6
unit: ppm/K
scope: material
conditions:
basis: experimental value quoted by an arXiv paper for CeO2; temperature range not stated in the text read
unit_in_source: 1.16 x 10^-5 K^-1
method: Quoted by the paper as the experimental value, set against its own simulated value (1.05 x 10^-5 K^-1). Converted from 1.16 x 10^-5 K^-1 to 11.6 ppm/K.
status: ground
source: arxiv-han-2023
where: Discussion of Fig. 1 (lattice constants against temperature), sentence on the linear thermal expansion coefficient of CeO2
corrosion:
- environment: Electron radiation at space-representative energies (laboratory, 1 MeV electrons)
headline: Ceria doping greatly reduces the radiation darkening that undoped cover glass shows.
effect: Undoped Micro-Sheet cover glass browned under 1 MeV electrons and lost 3.85 percent (single-coated) and 3.60 percent (double-coated) of wideband transmission. The 1.5 percent ceria-doped glass lost very little by comparison, and the authors found that a 5.0 percent ceria glass gave no significant further gain at the thickness tested.
rating: low
conditions:
exposure: 1 MeV electron irradiation in the laboratory
material: 1.5 percent ceria Micro-Sheet cover glass
note: ceria here is a dopant inside the glass, not a CeO2 layer
source: nasa-tn-d7245
where: Results (Figs. 4 to 8, Table II)
- environment: Ultraviolet exposure of a glass cover (doped ceria)
headline: Dopants added to ceria are reported to raise its chemical stability and UV absorption.
effect: The review says that adding dopants to ceria can enrich its thermal and chemical stability and give strong ultraviolet absorption. It gives no exposure time or dose, so the statement is qualitative.
rating: low
conditions:
basis: general review statement on doped ceria, no exposure test
source: pmc-ceria-review-2021
where: Introduction to the section on ceria doping
- environment: Water and humid air
headline: CeO2 is insoluble in water. No humidity or corrosion test on ceria was found.
effect: The Merck Index entry reproduced in PubChem describes CeO2 as white (pure) to pale-yellow crystals that are insoluble in water. No humidity exposure or corrosion test on ceria was read, so the rating reflects solubility only.
rating: low
conditions:
basis: qualitative solubility statement
exposure: not tested in the sources read
source: pubchem-ceria
where: Experimental Properties, Physical Description (Merck Index)
- environment: Hydrogen at high temperature (reducing gas)
headline: Hydrogen reduces CeO2 powder at high temperature, forming nonstoichiometric ceria.
effect: The review reports hydrogen as a reducing agent for CeO2 powders at high temperature and at atmospheric pressure. Nonstoichiometric ceria (CeO2-y) then stores oxygen. The passage read gives no temperature, rate or reversal behaviour for this reaction.
rating: low
conditions:
basis: literature statement in the review, no test conditions given
source: pmc-ceria-review-2021
where: Section on oxygen storage and hydrogen reduction of CeO2 (passage on H2 as a reducing agent)
risks:
hazards:
- text: PubChem's aggregated ECHA record gives 565 of 651 company reports as not meeting GHS hazard criteria. The remaining 86 reports carry hazard statement codes.
ghs: []
source: pubchem-ghs
where: Safety and Hazards, GHS Classification, ECHA C and L notifications summary (reference 16)
- text: The NITE-CMC classification in PubChem gives the signal word Danger and lists H371 (may cause damage to organs, specific target organ toxicity, single exposure) and H372 (causes damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure). Both are linked to the lung, with Category 1 for repeated exposure.
ghs:
- H371
- H372
source: pubchem-ghs
where: Safety and Hazards, GHS Classification, NITE-CMC notification (reference 22); Hazard Classes and Categories
failure_risks:
- mode: Lung damage from repeated inhalation of dust
trigger: Repeated or prolonged inhalation of airborne ceria dust in handling
consequence: The NITE classification lists H372 (Category 1, lung) and H371 (Category 2, lung), with signal word Danger. The effect is a health hazard for people, not a failure of the material in service.
severity: high
source: pubchem-ghs
where: Safety and Hazards, GHS Classification (NITE-CMC notification, reference 22)
- mode: Radiation darkening of undoped cover glass
trigger: 1 MeV electron irradiation of undoped solar-cell cover glass
consequence: Undoped glass browns and loses 3.85 percent (single-coated) to 3.60 percent (double-coated) of wideband transmission. The authors say this loss would need to be designed out by overdesigning the solar array.
severity: moderate
source: nasa-tn-d7245
where: Results, text on undoped glass and Table II
- mode: Loss of oxygen to nonstoichiometric ceria
trigger: Reducing gas such as hydrogen at high temperature
consequence: CeO2 gives up oxygen and forms CeO2-y with oxygen vacancies. This changes the redox and ion-transport behaviour that the material is used for in catalysts and electrolytes.
severity: low
source: pmc-ceria-review-2021
where: Section on oxygen storage and hydrogen reduction of CeO2
side_effects: []
handling:
- text: PubChem lists the precautionary codes P260, P264, P270, P308+P316, P319, P405 and P501 for the NITE classification. The record gives the codes only, not the full wording.
source: pubchem-ghs
where: Safety and Hazards, GHS Classification, Precautionary Statement Codes (NITE-CMC notification)
mitigations:
- text: Dope the cover glass with ceria at 1 to 2 percent by weight. The 1970 NASA note calls this the optimum range, and the 1973 note found that 5.0 percent gave no significant further gain.
source: nasa-tn-1971
where: Summary
uses:
- application: solar-arrays
device: Solar-cell cover glass made from ceria-doped Micro-Sheet (NASA ground study of radiation effects)
example: NASA Langley reported that 1.5 percent ceria-doped cover glass is much less sensitive to radiation-induced discoloration than undoped cover glass, and that it is comparable to synthetic fused silica for many space missions.
source: nasa-tn-d7245
where: Abstract
- application: solar-arrays
device: Commercial cerium-doped solar cell cover glass (SCHOTT)
example: SCHOTT describes a new cerium-doped solar cell cover glass with over 92 percent transmittance in the UV-A to near-infrared range, proven UV protection, reduced solarization and support for long-term stability in orbit.
source: schott-ceria-glass
where: Product description, first section on the cerium-doped cover glass
supply:
- subject: Cerium (rare earths group, USGS 2025 mine production, rare-earth oxide equivalent)
abundance: Not read in a source opened for this profile
producers:
- country: China
share_percent: 69.2
year: 2025
- country: United States
share_percent: 13.1
year: 2025
- country: Australia
share_percent: 7.4
year: 2025
- country: Burma
share_percent: 5.6
year: 2025
- country: Thailand
share_percent: 1.2
year: 2025
critical_lists:
- list: USGS 2025 List of Critical Minerals (Cerium is listed by name)
listed: true
- list: EU critical raw materials list
listed: false
price: 'USGS: cerium oxide, 99.5% minimum, average price $1.71 per kg in 2025e (rare-earth compounds)'
import_reliance: 'USGS: net import reliance for rare-earth compounds and metals was 67 percent of apparent consumption in 2025e'
recycling: 'USGS: limited quantities of rare earths were recovered from batteries, permanent magnets and fluorescent lamps. The chapter does not single out cerium oxide.'
substitutes:
- 'USGS: substitutes are available for many rare-earth applications but generally are less effective.'
source: usgs-mcs2026-rare-earths
where: 'Domestic Production and Use; Salient Statistics (price and net import reliance); World Mine Production and Reserves, 2025 column (world total 390,000 t REO, rounded). Shares are calculated by Space Mushroom from the printed tonnes and the rounded world total, and cover all rare earths, not cerium alone. Critical list: USGS 2025 List of Critical Minerals page.'
media: []
documents:
- title: 'PubChem: Ceria (CID 73963), Experimental Properties (melting point, density, physical description)'
type: database
url: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/rest/pug_view/data/compound/73963/JSON?heading=Experimental+Properties
year: 2026
- title: 'PubChem: Ceria (CID 73963), GHS classification and precautionary codes'
type: database
url: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/rest/pug_view/data/compound/73963/JSON
year: 2026
- title: 'USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Rare Earths'
type: report
url: https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2026/mcs2026-rare-earths.pdf
year: 2026
- title: 'NASA TN D-7245: Effect of 1 MeV Electrons on Ceria-Doped Solar Cell Cover Glass'
type: report
url: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19730015355/downloads/19730015355.pdf
year: 1973
- title: 'NASA Technical Note (Langley, Dec 1970): Effect of Radiation on Cerium-Doped Solar-Cell Cover Glass'
type: report
url: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19710002803/downloads/19710002803.pdf
year: 1970
- title: Gd-doped ceria with extraordinary oxygen-ion conductivity for low temperature solid oxide fuel cells (open access)
type: paper
url: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-59030-6
year: 2024
- title: An Insight into Geometries and Catalytic Applications of CeO2 from a DFT Outlook (Molecules 26, 6485, open access)
type: paper
url: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8588098/
year: 2021
- title: 'SCHOTT: Solar cell cover glass, cerium-doped generation'
type: datasheet
url: https://www.schott.com/en-cz/solar-cell-cover-glass
year: 2026
- title: Predictions and Measurements of Thermal Conductivity of Ceramic Materials at High Temperature (arXiv:2305.10918)
type: paper
url: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.10918
year: 2023
- title: 'USGS: About the 2025 List of Critical Minerals (final list of 60 minerals)'
type: report
url: https://www.usgs.gov/programs/mineral-resources-program/science/about-2025-list-critical-minerals
year: 2025
gaps:
- No vacuum, radiation-flight or thermal-vacuum result for pure CeO2 was found. The space evidence is for ceria as a dopant in cover glass (1970 and 1973 NASA ground tests) and for a commercial glass (SCHOTT claim).
- Atomic weights for cerium and oxygen were not read in a source opened for this profile, so the recipe parts carry no atomic_weight. The molecular weight 172.115 g/mol is PubChem's.
- Density and melting point differ between sources. This profile uses the PubChem values (7.65 g/cm3 at 25 degC, 2600 degC). Other listings seen in search results were not read in a primary source and are not used.
- Lattice constant of CeO2 was not read in a source opened for this profile.
- Thermal conductivity of pure CeO2 was not found in a source read. The arXiv paper gives a simulated and experimental expansion coefficient but no conductivity for pure CeO2.
- Ionic conductivity values for pure CeO2 were not found. The 0.104 S/cm value is for 15 mol % gadolinia-doped ceria at 700 degC, grain-boundary component.
- Abundance of cerium in the Earth's crust was not read in a source opened for this profile.
- The EU critical raw materials list was not checked for cerium.
- The SCHOTT page gives no UV cut-off wavelength or luminous transmittance value. The 92 percent figure is a spectral range claim for the glass, not a pure-CeO2 value.
- The NASA 1973 text does not print a clear number for the transmission loss of the 1.5 percent ceria glass (the table is garbled in the scan), so only the undoped-glass losses are given as values.
- No supplier safety data sheet was read for this profile. Hazard data rest on PubChem (NITE and ECHA aggregated records). Supplier SDS documents found in search results disagree on classification and were not used.
- Several property names are not in the canonical list (molecular_weight, ionic_conductivity, activation_energy, density_relative_to_theoretical, transmittance, dopant_level, wideband_transmission_loss). They use short snake_case names as the brief allows.
sources:
pubchem-ceria:
title: 'PubChem compound record, Ceria (CID 73963): Experimental Properties (melting point, density, physical description)'
id: CID 73963; CAS 1306-38-3
url: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/rest/pug_view/data/compound/73963/JSON?heading=Experimental+Properties
year: 2026
kind: database
license: public domain (NCBI)
pubchem-mw:
title: 'PubChem compound record, Ceria (CID 73963): Molecular Weight (computed property)'
id: CID 73963
url: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/rest/pug_view/data/compound/73963/JSON?heading=Molecular+Weight
year: 2026
kind: database
license: public domain (NCBI)
pubchem-ghs:
title: 'PubChem compound record, Ceria (CID 73963): GHS Classification (NITE-CMC and ECHA notifications, precautionary codes)'
id: CID 73963
url: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/rest/pug_view/data/compound/73963/JSON
year: 2026
kind: database
license: public domain (NCBI)
usgs-mcs2026-rare-earths:
title: Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026, Rare Earths
id: USGS MCS 2026, February 2026
url: https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2026/mcs2026-rare-earths.pdf
year: 2026
kind: report
license: public domain (USGS)
usgs-crit2025:
title: About the 2025 List of Critical Minerals (USGS, final list of 60 minerals)
id: Final 2025 List of Critical Minerals, November 2025
url: https://www.usgs.gov/programs/mineral-resources-program/science/about-2025-list-critical-minerals
year: 2025
kind: web
license: public domain (USGS)
nasa-tn-d7245:
title: Effect of 1 MeV Electrons on Ceria-Doped Solar Cell Cover Glass (NASA TN D-7245, Langley)
id: NTRS 19730015355
url: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19730015355/downloads/19730015355.pdf
year: 1973
kind: report
license: public domain (NASA)
nasa-tn-1971:
title: Effect of Radiation on Cerium-Doped Solar-Cell Cover Glass (NASA Langley technical note, Dec 1970)
id: NTRS 19710002803
url: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19710002803/downloads/19710002803.pdf
year: 1970
kind: report
license: public domain (NASA)
gdc-sci-rep-2024:
title: Gd-doped ceria with extraordinary oxygen-ion conductivity for low temperature solid oxide fuel cells
id: doi:10.1038/s41598-024-59030-6 (Scientific Reports, 2024)
url: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-59030-6
year: 2024
kind: paper
license: open access (per publisher)
pmc-ceria-review-2021:
title: An Insight into Geometries and Catalytic Applications of CeO2 from a DFT Outlook
id: doi:10.3390/molecules26216485 (Molecules 26, 6485, PMC8588098)
url: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8588098/
year: 2021
kind: paper
license: CC BY 4.0
schott-ceria-glass:
title: 'SCHOTT: Solar cell cover glass (cerium-doped generation)'
id: manufacturer product page
url: https://www.schott.com/en-cz/solar-cell-cover-glass
year: 2026
kind: datasheet
license: manufacturer web page, linked not reproduced
arxiv-han-2023:
title: Predictions and Measurements of Thermal Conductivity of Ceramic Materials at High Temperature
id: arXiv:2305.10918
url: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.10918
year: 2023
kind: paper
license: arXiv preprint (license as listed on arXiv)
license: CC-BY-4.0
updated: '2026-10-26'
review:
status: draft
method: assistant
checked_values: 12
unreachable: 0
caveats: 2
note: Drafted by an AI assistant on 2026-10-26 from pages opened in this run. Values are from PubChem, two NASA notes, a 2024 doped-ceria paper, a SCHOTT product page and an arXiv preprint. Pure-CeO2 thermal, optical and electrical values are not in the file.
story:
recipe:
line: CeO2 is cerium(IV) oxide. Each formula unit combines one cerium atom with two oxygen atoms. In air, cerium metal oxidizes to CeO2, which takes a fluorite crystal structure.
parts:
- name: Cerium
symbol: Ce
role: The metal centre. Cerium sits in the +4 state in CeO2. Switching between Ce4+ and Ce3+ lets the oxide store and release oxygen, which is the basis of its catalytic use.
- name: Oxygen
symbol: O
role: Eight-coordinate cerium is surrounded by oxygen anions on the tetrahedral 8c sites of the fluorite lattice.
risk_groups:
- title: For people
level: 1
verdict: Hazard classification depends on the notifier
lead: Most company reports to PubChem's ECHA record say CeO2 is not classified, but the NITE entry carries a lung-damage warning with the signal word Danger.
points:
- label: The powder
line: PubChem's ECHA record gives 565 of 651 company reports as not meeting GHS hazard criteria. 86 reports list hazard codes.
- label: Repeated exposure
line: The NITE classification lists H372 (repeated exposure, lung, Category 1) and H371 (single exposure, lung, Category 2). Keep dust out of breathing zones.
- label: Precautions
line: The NITE entry lists precautionary codes P260, P264, P270, P308+P316, P319, P405 and P501 (codes only, without their full wording).
- title: Radiation and cover glass
lead: These results come from NASA ground tests of glass, not from flight.
points:
- label: Undoped glass
line: Undoped cover glass browned under 1 MeV electrons and lost 3.85 percent of wideband transmission (single-coated) and 3.60 percent (double-coated).
- label: Ceria-doped glass
line: A 1.5 percent ceria glass lost much less, and the authors judged the loss very small. Going to 5.0 percent gave no significant further benefit at the thickness tested.
- title: Handling and storage
points:
- label: Hydrogen
line: Hydrogen reduces CeO2 powder at high temperature to nonstoichiometric ceria. The review gives no temperature or rate for this reaction.
why: Cerium(IV) oxide is a stable, insoluble oxide that is useful because cerium can switch between two oxidation states. That switch lets ceria store and release oxygen, so it helps catalysts and it lets ceria absorb ultraviolet light when doped. NASA used it in cover glass because small amounts of ceria stop the glass from browning under electron radiation. Doped ceria also conducts oxide ions well at high temperature, which is why it is studied as a fuel-cell electrolyte.
uses:
- where: Solar-cell cover glass
line: NASA Langley found in 1970 and 1973 that 1.5 percent ceria in Micro-Sheet cover glass resists radiation darkening far better than undoped glass. SCHOTT now sells a cerium-doped cover glass and claims over 92 percent transmittance across the UV-A to near-infrared range. Both are ground or manufacturer evidence, not flight results for pure CeO2.
- where: Catalysts and catalytic converters
line: A 2021 review describes ceria, alone or with noble metals, as the oxygen store in three-way catalytic converters. It converts CO and hydrocarbons to CO2 and H2O and NOx to N2. The review also reports CeO2 catalysts for CO2 conversion and VOC removal.
- where: Solid oxide fuel cell electrolytes
line: Gadolinia-doped ceria is studied as an electrolyte for intermediate and low temperature solid oxide fuel cells. A 2024 study reports grain-boundary ionic conductivity of 0.104 S/cm at 700 degC for the 15 mol percent Gd composition, with an activation energy of 0.81 eV.
can_do:
- label: Radiation tolerance
value: 1.5 percent ceria
line: Doping cover glass with about 1.5 percent ceria keeps the glass clear under electron radiation. The authors said the ceria glass was comparable to synthetic fused silica for many space missions.
- label: UV absorption
value: Over 92 percent transmittance, UV-A to NIR
line: SCHOTT's cerium-doped cover glass is designed to protect against UV while passing the rest of the spectrum. The figure is a manufacturer claim for the glass, not pure CeO2.
- label: Melting point
value: 2600 degC
line: The PubChem record gives a melting point of 2600 degC, which puts ceria well above the working range of any polymer or metal in the collection.
compare: CeO2 is a dense, high-melting oxide with fluorite structure. Its melting point and density are printed in PubChem as 2600 degC and 7.65 g/cm3. Its expansion coefficient is about 11.6 ppm/K, close to other oxides in the ceramic group. Its main space case is as a dopant that protects glass from radiation darkening, not as a structural or thermal material.
compare_rows:
- label: Density
benchmark: density
- label: Melting point
benchmark: melting_point
- label: Thermal expansion
benchmark: cte
handling:
- PubChem's NITE entry carries H371 and H372 and the signal word Danger. Avoid repeated inhalation of dust.
- Hydrogen reduces CeO2 to nonstoichiometric ceria at high temperature. Keep reducing gases away from hot ceria if the oxide composition matters.
good_for:
- Radiation-resistant cover glass. NASA's 1970 and 1973 tests found ceria-doped glass much less prone to browning under electron radiation than undoped glass.
- Oxygen storage in catalysts. The 2021 review describes ceria as the oxygen store in three-way catalytic converters.
watch_out:
- Repeated inhalation of dust. PubChem's NITE classification lists H372 (Category 1, lung) with the signal word Danger.
- Most of the space evidence is for ceria as a dopant in glass. No flight result for pure CeO2 was found.
- The electrolyte figures are for gadolinia-doped ceria, not pure CeO2.
verdict: CeO2 earns its place in space work as a dopant that protects cover glass from radiation darkening. As a pure oxide it has useful melting point and density data, but the hazard entry for dust and the lack of pure-material flight data mean it should be treated as a proven dopant, not a stand-alone structural material.
References
Every number above carries a reference number. Click one to see the source and where in it the value comes from.