Fused silica optical solar reflector (OSR, second-surface silver mirror) OSR

Second-surface silver mirror on a fused silica substrate, optionally overcoated with alumina (aluminium oxide)

An optical solar reflector (OSR) is a second-surface silver mirror on a glass substrate, used on spacecraft radiators to reflect sunlight while radiating heat.

9 sources · Updated 2026-11-01 · CC BY 4.0

Evidence level

2 of 5

Lab-measured

Low solar absorptance

0.1 -

High infrared emittance

> 0.8 -

Emittance with temperature

0.80 at 300 K to 0.67 at 750 K

Corrosion protection

0.1 -

Thermal vacuum cycling

-40 °C to +120 °C

Recipe, share of the weight

  • Si not statedSilicon
  • O not statedOxygen
  • Ag not statedSilver
  • Al₂O₃ not statedAlumina (aluminium oxide)

Best for

Spacecraft radiator surfaces that must reflect sunlight while shedding heat (low solar absorptance with high infrared emittance)

Weakest at

Unprotected silver: a bare silver film blackened within a fraction of a second in the 1968 hydrogen sulfide test, and emittance falls as the surface warms

Risk at a glance

  • People None found. Mixed: silica not classified, silver classified
  • If it fails High. Corrosion of an unprotected silver film
  • Corrosion Severe. A bare silver film blackened within a fraction of a second in the 1968 test.

Quick facts: OSR

Key properties of OSR
PropertyValueBasis
Density2.2 g/cm³1 sourced value
Thermal conductivity1.4 W/(m·K)1 sourced value

What is the density of Fused silica optical solar reflector (OSR)?

Fused silica optical solar reflector (OSR) has a density of 2.2 g/cm³. The source and test conditions are listed in the properties table on this page.

What is the thermal conductivity of Fused silica optical solar reflector (OSR)?

Fused silica optical solar reflector (OSR) has a thermal conductivity of 1.4 W/(m·K). The source and test conditions are listed in the properties table on this page.

What is Fused silica optical solar reflector (OSR) used for?

Uses recorded in the sources include Satellite radiator surfaces (second-surface mirror); Commercial rigid OSR tile (SQUID3 SQ-1); Thermal subsystem component (SQ-1 listing).

Why it exists

An optical solar reflector (OSR) is a mirror that reflects sunlight while letting a spacecraft radiator shed its own heat. The 1968 Lockheed study for NASA defined the OSR as a second-surface silver mirror on a fused silica substrate, and this profile covers that design. Modern rigid OSR tiles, such as SQUID3's SQ-1, are sold for satellite radiators, but their datasheet does not name the substrate.

Where it's used

Satellite radiators (1968 NASA definition)

The 1968 study defined the OSR as a second-surface silver mirror on a fused silica substrate, for low solar absorptance and a low ratio of solar absorptance to infrared emittance.

Commercial rigid OSR tile

SQUID3 sells the SQ-1 for satellite radiators and structural panels, in standard sizes of 1 x 1 in and 2 x 2 in.

Recipe

Second-surface silver mirror on a fused silica substrate, optionally overcoated with alumina (aluminium oxide)

The fused silica substrate is made of silicon and oxygen. The reflective layer is vacuum-deposited silver on its back surface, and the 1968 test samples added an optional alumina (aluminium oxide) overcoat on top of the silver.

What OSR is made of
IngredientShare of the weightWhat it does
Silicon Si not stated Main element of the fused silica substrate. Its atomic weight is given as [28.084, 28.086] in the identity note (NIST).
Oxygen O not stated Second element of the fused silica substrate. Its atomic weight is given as [15.999 03, 15.999 77] in the identity note (NIST).
Silver Ag not stated The second-surface mirror. Silver reflects sunlight, and the 1968 samples used 1200 A of it on fused silica.
Alumina (aluminium oxide) Al₂O₃ not stated Optional overcoat over the silver, which the 1968 study tested at 210, 550 and 955 A to protect it from corrosion.

Weight shares are as printed in the sources.

What it can do

Low solar absorptance

0.1 -

measured

A commercial OSR sample read 0.049 in the 1968 study. Prepared fused silica OSRs averaged 0.044 before ultraviolet exposure and 0.054 after. SQUID3 prints 0.1 for the SQ-1. Each figure carries its own test conditions in the properties.

High infrared emittance

> 0.8 -

measured

SQUID3 prints an infrared emittance above 0.8 for the SQ-1, written as '> 0.8'. The 1968 study printed a total hemispherical emittance of 0.80 at 300 K for the fused silica OSR.

Emittance with temperature

0.80 at 300 K to 0.67 at 750 K

measured

According to the 1968 report text, emittance falls as the surface warms, from 0.80 at 300 K to 0.67 at 750 K.

Corrosion protection

0.1 -

measured

In the same hydrogen sulfide test, 210 A alumina over silver moved from 0.055 to 0.064 in one hour, while a bare silver film blackened within a fraction of a second.

Thermal vacuum cycling

-40 °C to +120 °C

SQUID3 claims the SQ-1 passes thermal vacuum cycling from -40 °C to +120 °C. This is a vendor claim with no test report read.

How it compares

Among the figures in this profile, the 1968 fused silica OSR is the measured reference: solar absorptance 0.044 before and 0.054 after ultraviolet exposure, against 0.049 for one commercial OSR sample. Against a bare silver film, which blackened within a fraction of a second in the hydrogen sulfide test, alumina-overcoated silver stayed at 0.064 after one hour with 210 A alumina. The SQ-1 datasheet prints a solar absorptance of 0.1, which is higher than the 1968 samples, but it gives no test method or substrate, so the two cannot be compared directly.

The same measurements for each material, so you can compare them. Each row names the key condition under the value; the full conditions and methods are in the numbered notes under Technical details.

Benchmarks
MeasurementOSR
Thermal behavior and safety
Thermal conductivity, fused silica substratePrinted in the Fused Silica Properties table1.4 W/m·°C
Physical and electrical
Mass density, SQ-1 rigid OSRVendor product table, printed as 400 g/m2400 g/m2
Thickness, SQ-1 rigid OSRVendor product table, printed as 0.3 mm0.3 mm
Thickness, SQ-1 as listed in SatCatalog0.2 to 0.4 mm3
Mass density limit, SQ-1 as listed in SatCatalog< 500 g/m^24
Density, fused silica substrate2.2 g/cm³16
Other measurements
Solar absorptance, SQ-1 rigid OSR0.1 -1
IR emittance, SQ-1 rigid OSR> 0.8 -2
Solar absorptance, commercial OSR (one sample)0.049 -5
Solar absorptance, prepared fused silica OSR before ultraviolet0.044 -6
Solar absorptance, prepared fused silica OSR after ultraviolet0.054 -7
Total hemispherical emittance, fused silica OSR at 300 K0.8 -8
Total hemispherical emittance, fused silica OSR at 750 K0.67 -9
Solar absorptance, 210 A alumina over silver, before exposure0.055 -10
Solar absorptance, 210 A alumina over silver, after 1 h0.064 -11
Solar absorptance, 550 A alumina over silver, before exposure0.054 -12
Solar absorptance, 550 A alumina over silver, after 1 h0.06 -13
Solar absorptance, 955 A alumina over silver, before exposure0.054 -14
Solar absorptance, 955 A alumina over silver, after 1 h0.059 -15
Refractive index, fused silica substrate1.457 -17

Why choose it, and why not

Good for

  • Radiator surfaces that need low solar absorptance with high infrared emittance. The 1968 OSR had 0.044 to 0.054 solar absorptance, and SQUID3 prints 0.1 with an infrared emittance above 0.8 for the SQ-1.
  • Thermal control in sunlight. The 1968 study states its purpose as low solar absorptance and a low ratio of absorptance to emittance.

Watch out for

  • Bare silver corrodes in sulfur-bearing humid air. In the 1968 test, the alumina overcoat was what protected it.
  • Emittance falls as the surface warms, from 0.80 at 300 K to 0.67 at 750 K.
  • Solar absorptance rose after ultraviolet exposure, by about 1% in the report, from 0.044 to 0.054 on average for prepared samples.
  • The SQ-1 datasheet does not name its substrate or test method, so its figures cannot be taken as fused silica data.

A fused silica OSR is a well-documented low-absorptance, high-emittance radiator surface, with measured data on corrosion, ultraviolet and proton exposure from a 1968 study prepared for NASA. The modern SQ-1 product sheet has catalogued figures only, with no named substrate or test method, so the 1968 fused silica design holds the measured detail.

Technical details

For scientists and researchers. Everything above comes from the record below: every number with its method, its conditions and its source.

Notes

The method, full conditions and any caveat for the numbered rows above.

Notes for the numbered rows
#MeasurementMethodConditionsCaveat
1Solar absorptance, SQ-1 rigid OSRVendor product table; the datasheet prints the value without a unit, recorded as dimensionlessproduct SQ-1 Rigid Optical Solar Reflectortest not printed on the datasheet—
2IR emittance, SQ-1 rigid OSRVendor product table, printed as '> 0.8' with no test method; recorded as a lower bound and dimensionlessproduct SQ-1 Rigid Optical Solar Reflectorprinted > 0.8—
3Thickness, SQ-1 as listed in SatCatalogRange printed on the SatCatalog details table as 0.2~0.4 mmproduct SQ-1 Optical Solar Reflectors as listed on SatCatalog (the page does not separate SQ-1 from SQ-2)—
4Mass density limit, SQ-1 as listed in SatCatalogUpper limit printed as < 500 g/m^2 on the SatCatalog details tableproduct SQ-1 Optical Solar Reflectors as listed on SatCatalog—
5Solar absorptance, commercial OSR (one sample)Laboratory value reported in the 1968 study text, given for comparison with the study's own prepared samplessubstrate fused silicacondition initial, before ultraviolet exposuresample count one sample only—
6Solar absorptance, prepared fused silica OSR before ultravioletAverage of prepared samples as printed in the text; the study says the grades of fused silica did not differ significantlysubstrate fused silica, prepared samples (average)condition before 500 equivalent sun-hour ultraviolet exposure at 700 K—
7Solar absorptance, prepared fused silica OSR after ultravioletAverage of prepared samples as printed in the text (changed from 0.044 to 0.054)substrate fused silica, prepared samples (average)condition after 500 equivalent sun-hour ultraviolet exposure at 700 K—
8Total hemispherical emittance, fused silica OSR at 300 KValue quoted in the text of Section 7.2 as printed 0.80; the report's summary says emittance was measured from 400 to 800 K, so this 300 K figure is a text statementsubstrate fused silica with vacuum-deposited silver, second surfacetemperature 300 KPrinted as 0.80 in the report text
9Total hemispherical emittance, fused silica OSR at 750 KValue quoted in the text of Section 7.2, as the endpoint of a decrease from 0.80 at 300 Ksubstrate fused silica with vacuum-deposited silver, second surfacetemperature 750 K—
10Solar absorptance, 210 A alumina over silver, before exposureMeasured value in Table 6-1 (accelerated corrosion test)coating 210 A alumina overcoat on 1200 A silver on fused silica substratestate before hydrogen sulfide exposure—
11Solar absorptance, 210 A alumina over silver, after 1 hMeasured value in Table 6-1 (accelerated corrosion test)coating 210 A alumina overcoat on 1200 A silver on fused silica substrateexposure 1 h in hydrogen sulfide vapour (ammonium polysulfide, near 100% relative humidity)—
12Solar absorptance, 550 A alumina over silver, before exposureMeasured value in Table 6-1 (accelerated corrosion test)coating 550 A alumina overcoat on 1200 A silver on fused silica substratestate before hydrogen sulfide exposure—
13Solar absorptance, 550 A alumina over silver, after 1 hMeasured value in Table 6-1 (accelerated corrosion test)coating 550 A alumina overcoat on 1200 A silver on fused silica substrateexposure 1 h in hydrogen sulfide vapour (ammonium polysulfide, near 100% relative humidity)—
14Solar absorptance, 955 A alumina over silver, before exposureMeasured value in Table 6-1 (accelerated corrosion test)coating 955 A alumina overcoat on 1200 A silver on fused silica substratestate before hydrogen sulfide exposure—
15Solar absorptance, 955 A alumina over silver, after 1 hMeasured value in Table 6-1 (accelerated corrosion test)coating 955 A alumina overcoat on 1200 A silver on fused silica substrateexposure 1 h in hydrogen sulfide vapour (ammonium polysulfide, near 100% relative humidity)—
16Density, fused silica substratePrinted as 2.20 g/cm3 in the Fused Silica Properties table; describes the substrate, not the OSR stacktemperature not stated on the page—
17Refractive index, fused silica substratePrinted in the refractive index table at 0.633 umwavelength 0.633 µm (633 nm)temperature not stated on the page—

Corrosion and compatibility

What happens when it meets other materials and environments.

Corrosion and compatibility
EnvironmentConcernWhat happens
Hydrogen sulfide vapour with near 100% relative humidity (accelerated test; ammonium polysulfide in a closed container) severe A bare silver film blackened within a fraction of a second in the 1968 test.1
Hydrogen sulfide vapour with near 100% relative humidity, 1 h (alumina overcoated silver) low Alumina overcoats kept silver usable in the same test: solar absorptance rose from 0.055 to 0.064 with 210 A alumina.2
Ultraviolet, 500 equivalent sun-hours at 700 K (fused silica substrates) low Ultraviolet at 700 K raised solar absorptance only slightly, by about 1%.3
2 keV protons, up to 5 x 10^17 p/cm2, substrate temperatures of 400, 530 and 700 K none No optical damage was seen in the fused silica OSRs under these proton exposures.4
Thermal vacuum cycling from -40 °C to +120 °C (manufacturer claim) not rated SQUID3 says the SQ-1 passes thermal vacuum cycling from -40 °C to +120 °C; no test report was read.5
Corrosion details
#EnvironmentDetailsTest conditions
1 Hydrogen sulfide vapour with near 100% relative humidity (accelerated test; ammonium polysulfide in a closed container) The report says this test is probably one of the most rigorous for silver films, and that a bare silver film blackened in a fraction of a second. Table 6-1 has one row marked film failure, with absorptance rising from 0.047 to 0.677; the text layer does not print that row's coating, so it is not used here as a bare-silver value. exposure closed container, hydrogen sulfide from ammonium polysulfide, near 100% relative humiditycoating bare silver film (one row of Table 6-1 marked film failure)
2 Hydrogen sulfide vapour with near 100% relative humidity, 1 h (alumina overcoated silver) Table 6-1 gives absorptance before and after one hour for 210 A alumina (0.055 to 0.064), 550 A (0.054 to 0.060) and 955 A (0.054 to 0.059) over 1200 A silver on fused silica. The conclusions say alumina of at least 500 A is very acceptable, and that in a corrosive environment the attack starts at the exposed substrate edge. exposure 1 h, closed container, hydrogen sulfide from ammonium polysulfidecoating 1200 A silver on fused silica with 210, 550 or 955 A alumina
3 Ultraviolet, 500 equivalent sun-hours at 700 K (fused silica substrates) The report says the OSRs showed a small increase in solar absorptance after the ultraviolet test, which it traced to a change in the transmittance of the fused silica (about 1%). Grades of fused silica did not differ significantly. Prepared samples changed from 0.044 to 0.054 on average; one commercial OSR sample, at 0.049, did not change. dose 500 equivalent sun-hourstemperature 700 Ksubstrates Suprasil 11, Spectrasil B, Corning 7940 (industrial and UV grade) and G.E. 151 fused silica
4 2 keV protons, up to 5 x 10^17 p/cm2, substrate temperatures of 400, 530 and 700 K The report says none of the samples showed optical damage, and that fused silica showed no change in solar absorptance after the highest proton dose at 700 K, whatever its grade or source. The report also checked the stability of the coating system's spectral reflectance after exposure. energy 2 keV protonsdose up to 5 x 10^17 p/cm2temperature 400, 530 and 700 K
5 Thermal vacuum cycling from -40 °C to +120 °C (manufacturer claim) The datasheet lists this among its features. No cycle count, test report or before-and-after optical values are printed, so this is a vendor claim only. basis vendor features listproducts SQ-1 and SQ-2

Risks and side effects

Hazards to people, what happens when a cell overheats, and how the material is handled and stored.

For people

PubChem summarizes ECHA notifications for these materials. Vitreous silica is listed as Not Classified. Silver is listed with H400 (very toxic to aquatic life), and a revised FY2022 entry lists H360 (may damage fertility or the unborn child).

Silica
Vitreous silica (EC 262-373-8) is listed as Not Classified. Other silica forms on the same PubChem record are classified, so the form matters.
Silver
The main ECHA entry for silver (EC 231-131-3) carries H400. A revised classification for silver, excluding nanoparticles, carries Danger with H360.
Data limits
These are aggregated company notifications, not a product safety data sheet. No safety data sheet for the OSR was read.

If the coating is damaged

The 1968 study tested the failure mode that matters most for silver: sulfur-bearing humid air.

Bare silver
In the hydrogen sulfide test, the report says a bare silver film blackened within a fraction of a second.
Edges
In a corrosive environment the attack starts at the exposed substrate edge, according to the report's conclusions.

Handling and storage

Preparation
The report's preparation used a mild hydrofluoric etch of the substrate, then heating to about 500 K before deposition. This profile records no safety data for hydrofluoric acid.

Test details
The original wording and numbers from the sources, for readers who want them.

Failure risks

Failure risks
FailureTrigger and consequence
Corrosion of an unprotected silver filmhigh severityHumid, sulfur-bearing air (hydrogen sulfide vapour in the 1968 accelerated test)The report says a bare silver film blackened in a fraction of a second. The silver is what gives the OSR its low solar absorptance.
Attack from exposed substrate edgesmoderate severityA corrosive environment reaching the uncovered edge of the coatingThe report says in a corrosive environment the attack starts at the exposed substrate edge.
Rise in solar absorptance after ultraviolet exposurelow severity500 equivalent sun-hours of ultraviolet at 700 KSolar absorptance rose by about 1%, which the report traces to a change in transmittance of the fused silica.

Side effects on surrounding parts

Side effects on surrounding parts
AffectsEffect
Radiator heat rejection at high surface temperatureEmittance falls as the surface warms, from 0.80 at 300 K to 0.67 at 750 K.

Handling and storage

  • The report's preparation used a mild hydrofluoric substrate etch, then heating the substrate to about 500 K before vacuum deposition, for silver adhesion. The report says this treatment did not change solar absorptance.

Mitigations

  • Overcoat the silver with alumina of at least 500 A; the report's conclusions call this minimum very acceptable for corrosion resistance in its hydrogen sulfide test.

Supply and geography

How common the raw materials are and where they come from.

Silver (reflective layer)

Top producers (2025)
Mexico 24.2%, Peru 13.8%, China 13.1%
Critical mineral lists
US: listed
Recycling
USGS: about 1,000 tons of silver was recovered from new and old scrap in the United States in 2025, about 11% of apparent consumption.
Substitutes
USGS lists substitutes for photographic, surgical, flatware and some battery uses; it does not discuss mirror coatings.

Silicon (fused silica substrate)

Top producers (2025)
China 87%, Brazil 3.9%, Norway 2.8%, Russia 0.8%
Critical mineral lists
US: listed
Recycling
USGS silicon chapter: recycling is "Insignificant."
Substitutes
USGS silicon chapter: gallium arsenide and germanium are the principal substitutes for silicon in semiconductor and infrared applications.

Updated