Materials/Polymers/Polyimides

Kapton HN

misse2-pi-kapton-hn

In short

On the International Space Station's forward-facing side, oxygen atoms ate away 237 µm of Kapton HN in 3.95 years, about 60 µm a year. A standard 25 µm film of it would last about 5 months there. It resists atomic oxygen 1.1 times better than Kapton H, the reference film.

Benchmarks

The benchmarks that matter for this material's applications, each compared with the reference engineers use.

BenchmarkResultCompared with reference
Atomic oxygen erosionHow fast low-orbit oxygen eats the surface. Lower is better. 2.81×10⁻²⁴ cm³/atomLow Earth orbit, 3.95 years in flight 0.94× Kapton HResists 1.1× better

Not measured yet (5): darkening under UV and particles (Δα); outgassing, total mass loss (TML); outgassing, condensable (CVCM); thermal cycling survival; flammability (crewed vehicles).

Applications

Where materials like Kapton HN are considered, the benchmarks that decide each use, and what the measured data says so far.

ApplicationDeciding benchmarksWhat the data says
External surfaces in low Earth orbit1 of 2 deciding benchmarks measured
  • Atomic oxygen erosion
  • Darkening under UV and particles (Δα)
Atomic oxygen resistance is poor (0.94×): unprotected, it wears through quickly on forward-facing low-orbit surfaces and would need a protective coating. Still needed: darkening under UV and particles (Δα).
Thermal blankets (MLI) outer layer1 of 4 deciding benchmarks measured
  • Atomic oxygen erosion
  • Darkening under UV and particles (Δα)
  • Outgassing, total mass loss (TML)
  • Outgassing, condensable (CVCM)
Atomic oxygen resistance is poor (0.94×): unprotected, it wears through quickly on forward-facing low-orbit surfaces and would need a protective coating. Still needed: darkening under UV and particles (Δα); outgassing, total mass loss (TML); outgassing, condensable (CVCM).

"What the data says" is Space Mushroom's reading of the measured values, not a flight qualification. Deciding benchmarks come from the Benchmark Framework.

What it went through

WhereISS, MISSE 2, PEC 2 tray 1 (outside the Quest airlock)
When2001-08-16 to 2005-07-30 (3.95 years)
Atomic oxygen dose8.43×10²¹ atoms/cm²
Sunlight5,000–6,700 equivalent sun hours
TemperatureCycled between −30 °C and 40 °C
Also exposed toSolar UV and charged particle radiation, in vacuum

How it compares

Materials flown on the same tray, ranked from least to most eroded. Kapton HN is number 22 of 40.

RankMaterialCompared with Kapton HLost in 3.95 years
5 FEPFluorinated ethylene propylene 0.067× 17 µm
20 PBIPolybenzimidazole >0.74× >186 µm
21 PPPolypropylene 0.89× 226 µm
22 Kapton HNPolyimide (PMDA) 0.94× 237 µm
23 PSUPolysulphone 0.98× 248 µm
24 PEEKPolyetheretherketone 1.00× 252 µm
25 Kapton HPolyimide (PMDA) 1.00× 253 µm

How the numbers are calculated

  • Erosion yield is NASA's measurement: volume of material removed per oxygen atom.
  • Thickness lost = erosion yield × oxygen dose = 2.81×10⁻²⁴ cm³/atom × 8.43×10²¹ atoms/cm² = 0.0237 cm = 237 µm.
  • Compared with Kapton H = erosion yield ÷ 3.00×10⁻²⁴ (Kapton H's value on the same flight).
  • Film life = 25 µm ÷ 60 µm per year, for the same exposure.