Z-93 / Z-93P white thermal control paint (zinc oxide in potassium silicate) Z-93

ZnO pigment in potassium silicate binder (SiO2:K2O mole ratio 3.3:1 for the original PS-7 binder) · CAS 1314-13-2 (zinc oxide pigment)

Also known as Z-93

Z-93 is a white thermal control paint made of zinc oxide pigment in a potassium silicate binder.

9 sources · Updated 2026-11-01 · CC BY 4.0

Evidence level

5 of 5

Flown or field-proven

Solar absorptance

0.135 -

Emittance

0.92 -

Long-term LEO

0.135 -

Recipe, share of the weight

  • ZnO not statedZinc oxide
  • K2O and SiO2 not statedPotassium silicate

Best for

White radiator surfaces in low Earth orbit where long-term stability and low contamination matter more than conductivity. NASA selected Z-93 for ISS radiators on the basis of its LDEF performance.

Weakest at

Silicone contamination yellows the coating and raises solar absorptance (0.16 to 0.23 on POSA-I after 18 months). Ground VUV tests darkened it, and the darkening was partly reversed by air exposure.

Risk at a glance

  • People None found. Hazardous in the supplier data we read
  • If it fails High. Silicone contamination yellows the coating and raises solar absorptance
  • Corrosion Severe. Silicone contamination of about 5,000 Angstrom turned Z-93P yellow-tan and raised solar absorptance from 0.16 to 0.23.

Why it exists

Z-93 is a white thermal control paint made of zinc oxide pigment in a potassium silicate binder, and NASA has flown it for years in low Earth orbit. On the MISSE-2 trays it kept a solar absorptance of 0.14 after 5,130 ESH and 5,660 ESH of UV, per the 2008 NASA report. Solar absorptance is the fraction of sunlight the surface absorbs, and thermal emittance is how well it radiates heat. Z-93 is a good fit for radiator surfaces where long-term stability in LEO matters, and it is the coating NASA chose for ISS radiators on the basis of its LDEF results.

Where it's used

ISS radiators

NASA selected Z-93 for ISS radiators on the basis of its LDEF performance, according to the 2008 report.

Space Station Freedom

In 1993 Z-93 was screened as a radiator coating for Space Station Freedom, against a 30 year design life and an end-of-life solar absorptance of 0.3.

Geostationary conductive coatings

NASA GSFC tested the conductive white coating Z93C55 for geostationary use, with an end-of-life solar absorptance requirement below 0.45.

MISSE and POSA-I

Z-93 and Z-93P flew on MISSE-2, MISSE-4 and POSA-I, and Z-93P also flew on OPM.

Recipe

ZnO pigment in potassium silicate binder (SiO2:K2O mole ratio 3.3:1 for the original PS-7 binder)

Z-93 is zinc oxide pigment dispersed in a potassium silicate binder. The original binder was PS-7 (Sylvania), and Z-93P uses Kasil 2130 (PQ Corporation). The binder is applied as a liquid and dries to an inorganic film. The pigment-to-binder ratio is not published in the sources read.

What Z-93 is made of
IngredientShare of the weightWhat it does
Zinc oxide ZnO not stated White pigment. The zinc oxide band gap of about 3.8 eV absorbs ultraviolet, which forms colour centres under VUV.
Potassium silicate K2O and SiO2 not stated Inorganic binder. The SiO2:K2O mole ratio is 3.3:1 for PS-7 and Kasil 2130, and it reactively binds the pigment.

Weight shares are as printed in the sources.

What it can do

Solar absorptance

0.135 -

measured

Z-93 kept 0.14 on MISSE-2 and rose to 0.15 on MISSE-4 after flight.

Emittance

0.92 -

measured

After oxygen plasma ashing, Z-93 kept a thermal emittance of 0.92 in the 1991 test.

Long-term LEO

0.135 -

measured

On LDEF, Z-93 changed little over 5.8 years, with solar absorptance at 0.15 after flight on S0069 and 0.16 to 0.17 on A0034.

How it compares

Z-93 sits with the inorganic white coatings. Its sister coating YB-71 (zinc orthotitanate in potassium silicate) was tested alongside it in the 1991 and 1993 studies. Against the polyurethane A-276 with leafing aluminium, which started at 0.23 plus or minus 0.03 and reached 0.57 on wake-facing LDEF samples, Z-93 kept its optics much closer to beginning-of-life in the sources read. Z93C55 is a separate conductive formulation, with a beginning of life solar absorptance of 0.14 and normal emittance of 0.92 per the 2018 paper, and it is not interchangeable with Z-93.

The same measurements for each material, so you can compare them. Each row names the key condition under the value; the full conditions and methods are in the numbered notes under Technical details.

Benchmarks
MeasurementZ-93
Thermal behavior and safety
Thermal emittance of Z-93 after plasma ashing0.92 -11
Normal thermal emittance of Z93C550.92 -14
Hemispherical thermal emittance of Z93C550.94 -15
Physical and electrical
Z-93 thickness giving minimum solar absorptanceThickness as stated in the report text4 mil
Z-93 applied coating thickness, spray process0.1 mm12
Other measurements
Solar absorptance, Z-93 before MISSE-2 flight0.136 -1
Solar absorptance, Z-93 after MISSE-2 ram-facing flight0.135 -2
Solar absorptance, Z-93 after MISSE-4 wake-facing flight0.146 -3
Solar absorptance, Z-93 post-flight MISSE-2 at 5,130 ESH0.14 -4
Solar absorptance, Z-93 post-flight MISSE-2 at 5,660 ESH0.14 -5
Solar absorptance, Z-93 post-flight MISSE-3 at about 1,200 ESH0.14 -6
Solar absorptance, Z-93 post-flight MISSE-4 at about 1,200 ESH0.15 -7
Solar absorptance, Z-93 pre-flight on LDEF tray S0069Solar absorptance as stated in the report text0.14 -
Solar absorptance, Z-93 after 5.8 years on LDEF tray S0069Solar absorptance as stated in the report text0.15 -
Solar absorptance, Z-93 ram-facing on LDEF A0034 after 5.8 yearsSolar absorptance as stated in the report text0.16 -
Solar absorptance, Z-93 wake-facing on LDEF A0034 after 5.8 yearsSolar absorptance as stated in the report text0.17 -
Solar absorptance, Z-93P control on POSA-I (Mir)0.16 -8
Solar absorptance, Z-93P Mir-facing on POSA-I after 18 months0.166 -9
Solar absorptance, Z-93P space-facing on POSA-I after 18 months0.228 -10
Solar absorptance of Z-93 after VUV exposureTable VI value0.18 -
Areal mass of Z-93 measured after ashingMass per area from weighing, Table VI0.018 g/cm²
Areal mass of Z-93 vendor specification, unexposedVendor specification as printed in Table VI0.0162 g/cm²
Solar absorptance of Z93C55 beginning of life0.14 -13
Change in solar absorptance of Z93C55 after combined solar wind exposure0.051 -16
Change in solar absorptance of Z93C55 sample 1 after 300 keV electronsChange from initial solar absorptance0.18 -
Change in solar absorptance of Z93C55 sample 2 after 300 keV electronsChange from initial solar absorptance0.26 -
Change in solar absorptance of Z93C55 sample 1 after post-UV recoveryChange from initial solar absorptance0.16 -
Change in solar absorptance of Z93C55 sample 2 after post-UV recoveryChange from initial solar absorptance0.29 -

Why choose it, and why not

Good for

  • Radiators in low Earth orbit: flight trays kept solar absorptance at 0.14 to 0.15 after MISSE-2 and MISSE-4 exposure.
  • Long missions with low contamination: the 2008 report says the optics hold for years when contamination is 300 Angstrom or less.
  • Places with atomic oxygen and UV: the 2008 report says the inorganic binder held up while organic polyurethane coatings eroded.

Watch out for

  • Silicone contamination yellows the coating: Z-93P rose from 0.16 to 0.23 on POSA-I.
  • Ground VUV tests exaggerate darkening, and the reading must be taken in situ or before air exposure.
  • Z-93P and the original Z-93 do not behave the same in every test, and the cause is not known.

Z-93 is the proven inorganic white radiator paint for LEO. It keeps its optics through flight when silicone contamination is controlled, and its ground data are reliable only when measured in situ.

Technical details

For scientists and researchers. Everything above comes from the record below: every number with its method, its conditions and its source.

Other names and standards

The same grade under other systems, as datasheets and standards print them. Each code was checked against the page it comes from.

Other names and standards
SystemCodes
Trade nameZ-93

Notes

The method, full conditions and any caveat for the numbered rows above.

Notes for the numbered rows
#MeasurementMethodConditionsCaveat
1Solar absorptance, Z-93 before MISSE-2 flightSolar absorptance printed on the reflectance chart; the slide does not state the measurement standardbasis Z-93 with original PS-7 binder on aluminium, measured before flight; value printed to three decimals on the slidebinder PS-7 (original)—
2Solar absorptance, Z-93 after MISSE-2 ram-facing flightSolar absorptance printed on the reflectance chart; standard not stated on the slidebasis MISSE-2 ram-facing side, about 7.2 to 7.6e21 atoms/cm2 atomic oxygen and 5,100 to 6,000 ESH per the exposure slideexposure years about 4 (MISSE-1 and MISSE-2 were on ISS for nearly four years)—
3Solar absorptance, Z-93 after MISSE-4 wake-facing flightSolar absorptance printed on the reflectance chart; standard not stated on the slidebasis MISSE-4 wake-facing side, 2.0e20 atoms/cm2 atomic oxygen and about 1,200 ESH per Table 1 of the 2008 reportexposure years 1 (MISSE-3 and MISSE-4 were on ISS for one year)—
4Solar absorptance, Z-93 post-flight MISSE-2 at 5,130 ESHSolar absorptance as listed in the report's table, Alion Z-93 rowsbasis Z-93 on aluminium, MISSE-2, pre-flight 0.14 and post-flight 0.14atomic oxygen fluence 1.4e20 atoms/cm2uv esh 5130—
5Solar absorptance, Z-93 post-flight MISSE-2 at 5,660 ESHSolar absorptance as listed in the report's tablebasis Z-93 on aluminium, MISSE-2 second tray, pre-flight 0.14 and post-flight 0.14atomic oxygen fluence 7.2e21 atoms/cm2uv esh 5660—
6Solar absorptance, Z-93 post-flight MISSE-3 at about 1,200 ESHSolar absorptance as listed in the report's tablebasis Z-93 on aluminium, MISSE-3, pre-flight 0.14 and post-flight 0.14atomic oxygen fluence 1.2e21 atoms/cm2uv esh about 1,200 (the 2008 slide gives about 1,500 ESH for MISSE-3 trays; both shown in gaps)—
7Solar absorptance, Z-93 post-flight MISSE-4 at about 1,200 ESHSolar absorptance as listed in the report's tablebasis Z-93 on aluminium, MISSE-4, pre-flight 0.14 and post-flight 0.15atomic oxygen fluence 2.0e20 atoms/cm2uv esh about 1,200—
8Solar absorptance, Z-93P control on POSA-I (Mir)Solar absorptance printed on the reflectance chart; standard not stated on the slidebasis Z-93P (Kasil 2130 binder) control sample, not exposed on the POSA-I traybinder Kasil 2130—
9Solar absorptance, Z-93P Mir-facing on POSA-I after 18 monthsSolar absorptance printed on the reflectance chartbasis Z-93P, Mir-facing side with about 250 Angstrom silicone contamination, 18 months on Mirbinder Kasil 2130—
10Solar absorptance, Z-93P space-facing on POSA-I after 18 monthsSolar absorptance printed on the reflectance chartbasis Z-93P, space-facing side with about 5,000 Angstrom silicone contamination and 571 ESH of UV, 18 months on Mirbinder Kasil 2130—
11Thermal emittance of Z-93 after plasma ashingTable VI value; instrument for the emittance column not restated in Table VIbasis Measured after oxygen RF plasma ashing (Table VI column Emittance After Ashing)atomic oxygen basis ashing fluence per the report's Table V; exponent not read in this run—
12Z-93 applied coating thickness, spray processThickness as stated in the report text (Materials Tested)basis Applied to 6061-T6 disks of about 2.5 cm diameter and 0.79 mm thickness by low-pressure, high-volume spray—
13Solar absorptance of Z93C55 beginning of lifeASTM E903-82 with a Cary 5000 spectrophotometer, per the paperproduct Z93C55, Alion conductive white coating (a separate formulation from Z-93)basis Measured optical properties before testing, Table 1—
14Normal thermal emittance of Z93C55ASTM E408-71 with a Gier Dunkel DB100 reflectometer, per the paperproduct Z93C55, Alion conductive white coating (a separate formulation from Z-93)basis Normal emittance, Table 1, Z93C55 row, en column—
15Hemispherical thermal emittance of Z93C55Surface Optics SOC-100 hemispherical directional reflectometer, per the paperproduct Z93C55, Alion conductive white coating (a separate formulation from Z-93)basis Hemispherical emittance, Table 1, Z93C55 row, hemispherical column—
16Change in solar absorptance of Z93C55 after combined solar wind exposureChange from initial solar absorptance, in-vacuo measurement in the GSFC solar wind facilityproduct Z93C55basis Solar wind facility: 20 keV electrons 9.30E+15 e-/cm2, 2 keV protons 1.20E+16 p+/cm2, NUV 1123 ESH—

Corrosion and compatibility

What happens when it meets other materials and environments.

Corrosion and compatibility
EnvironmentConcernWhat happens
Space, MISSE-2 and MISSE-4 trays on the ISS (ram and wake sides) low Z-93 kept its solar absorptance within 0.01 of its pre-flight value on MISSE-2 and rose to 0.15 on one MISSE-4 tray.1
Space, LDEF, 5.8 years in low Earth orbit (S0069 and A0034 trays, ram, wake and covered samples) low Z-93 with the original PS7 binder changed little after 5.8 years on LDEF, and its emittance did not change.2
Space, silicone contamination on a Mir-facing and a space-facing POSA-I tray with 571 ESH of UV severe Silicone contamination of about 5,000 Angstrom turned Z-93P yellow-tan and raised solar absorptance from 0.16 to 0.23.3
Ground, VUV plus atomic oxygen in an RF plasma asher and an ECR beam, in vacuum and then in room air moderate VUV darkens Z-93 in vacuum, and exposure to air reverses part of that darkening, so the reading must be taken in situ.4
Ground, line-of-sight ECR atomic oxygen beam with silicone adhesive samples nearby severe In a ground test with silicone present, Z-93 darkened far more than it does in space; the authors say the damage is not representative.5
Ground and vacuum thermal cycling, -93 C to +49 C low Z-93 showed a negligible change in emittance and a small reduction in solar absorptance after 10 vacuum thermal cycles.6
Comparator, A-276 polyurethane with leafing aluminium on LDEF (not Z-93) severe The polyurethane comparator A-276 started at a solar absorptance of 0.23 and reached 0.57 on wake-facing LDEF samples, so Z-93 holds up better for long missions.7
Corrosion details
#EnvironmentDetailsTest conditions
1 Space, MISSE-2 and MISSE-4 trays on the ISS (ram and wake sides) After ISS exposure with 5,130 to 5,660 ESH of UV and atomic oxygen up to 7.2e21 atoms/cm2, Z-93 stayed at 0.14 on MISSE-2. On MISSE-4 at about 1,200 ESH the post-flight value was 0.15. The report gives no infrared emittance values for these trays. exposure ISS MISSE-2 and MISSE-4 trays, about 4 years for MISSE-2 and 1 year for MISSE-4atomic oxygen fluence range 1.4e20 to 7.2e21 atoms/cm2
2 Space, LDEF, 5.8 years in low Earth orbit (S0069 and A0034 trays, ram, wake and covered samples) S0069 solar absorptance went from 0.14 before flight to 0.15 after. A0034 samples read 0.16 for ram-facing and 0.17 for wake-facing. Some samples were covered with quartz or aluminium to block atomic oxygen and UV, and they showed the same little change. exposure 5.8 years in LEO on LDEFbinder PS7 (original)
3 Space, silicone contamination on a Mir-facing and a space-facing POSA-I tray with 571 ESH of UV Z-93P on the space-facing side of POSA-I received about 5,000 Angstrom of silicone contamination and only 571 ESH of UV, and its solar absorptance went from 0.16 to 0.23 over 18 months. The Mir-facing side had about 250 Angstrom and stayed close to beginning-of-life. The report says contamination of 300 Angstrom or less keeps the coating near its beginning-of-life value. contamination thickness about 5,000 Angstrom (space-facing) and about 250 Angstrom (Mir-facing)duration 18 months on Mir
4 Ground, VUV plus atomic oxygen in an RF plasma asher and an ECR beam, in vacuum and then in room air Zinc oxide has a band gap of about 3.8 eV, so ultraviolet photons above that energy create electron-hole pairs that form colour centres. The authors say oxygen causes the reversal of colour-centre formation, so room-air exposure after ground VUV or combined VUV and atomic oxygen testing can make the damage look smaller than it is. In the first ECR combined test, Z-93 showed a moderate reduction in solar absorptance after exposure to air. environment ground test: RF plasma asher and ECR atomic oxygen beam with deuterium VUV lamps, not flight
5 Ground, line-of-sight ECR atomic oxygen beam with silicone adhesive samples nearby Z-93 exposed in the ECR beam near silicone adhesive showed a yellow-brown discolouration from silicone contamination, which the paper says is fixed by atomic oxygen with intense 130 nm VUV. The authors say the Z-93 degradation here is much more severe than in space. They also say that exposed silicone surfaces in LEO could severely contaminate nearby surfaces. atomic oxygen fluence 5.3e21 atoms/cm2 in the silicone testenvironment ground test, not flight
6 Ground and vacuum thermal cycling, -93 C to +49 C The 1993 test ran 10 cycles between -93 C and +49 C in vacuum. Z-93 showed a negligible change in emittance and a small reduction in solar absorptance, which the authors suspect is water loss on dehydration. Separately, MISSE-1 and MISSE-2 went through about 22,800 thermal cycles, mostly between +40 C and -30 C. cycles ground 10range ground -93 C to +49 Ccycles flight about 22,800 (MISSE-1 and MISSE-2)
7 Comparator, A-276 polyurethane with leafing aluminium on LDEF (not Z-93) A-276 is eroded by atomic oxygen and darkened by UV on LDEF, which the report calls well documented. Beginning-of-life solar absorptance was 0.23 plus or minus 0.03, ram-facing samples stayed near 0.30, and wake-facing samples read as high as 0.57. The report calls A-276 useful for short-term missions only. comparator A-276 polyurethane with leafing aluminium, not Z-93

Risks and side effects

Hazards to people, what happens when a cell overheats, and how the material is handled and stored.

For people

No Z-93 safety data sheet was found. Zinc oxide is classed as very toxic to aquatic life, and a potassium silicate coating from another supplier is classed as causing severe skin burns.

Zinc oxide
The zinc oxide SDS gives H400 and H410: very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects. Avoid release to the environment.
Potassium silicate
The CSP potassium silicate coating SDS gives H314 (severe skin burns and eye damage) and H318, with H302 for oral harm. That is a different product.
Spray
The coating is sprayed. Wear eye and skin protection, and avoid breathing the spray mist.

For the radiator

The pigment stays stable in LEO. Silicone deposits are the main threat.

LDEF
After 5.8 years on LDEF, solar absorptance went from 0.14 to 0.15 for S0069.
Silicone
Silicone contamination of about 5,000 Angstrom took Z-93P from 0.16 to 0.23 on POSA-I.
Ground tests
VUV in ground tests darkens the coating, and the darkening can reverse in air, so measure in situ.

Handling and storage

Apply by spray at the specified thickness and keep silicone and outgassing sources away.

Thickness
The 1993 test used 0.10 to 0.13 mm, and the 1991 test found 4 to 5 mil gave minimum solar absorptance.
Contamination
The 2008 report says durability holds for years when contamination control limits outgassing and molecular deposits.

Test details
The original wording and numbers from the sources, for readers who want them.

Failure risks

Failure risks
FailureTrigger and consequence
Silicone contamination yellows the coating and raises solar absorptancehigh severitySilicone outgassing or eroded silicone adhesive deposits on the radiatorZ-93P on POSA-I rose from 0.16 to 0.23 in solar absorptance after about 5,000 Angstrom of silicone and 571 ESH of UV, which raises the radiator temperature.
Darkening from VUV is partly reversed by air, so ground numbers can understate or overstate damagemoderate severitySolar absorptance measured after air exposure rather than in situ after VUV or combined VUV and atomic oxygen exposureThe 1993 test found a moderate reduction in solar absorptance for Z-93 after air exposure, and a dramatic reduction for YB-71 and Z-93-P, so the in situ reading is the valid one.
New binder version (Z-93P) behaves differently in one ground testmoderate severityReformulation with Kasil 2130 potassium silicate in place of PS-7In the first ECR combined test, Z-93-P showed severe degradation at the first increment that the original Z-93 did not. The authors do not know the cause and suspect processing parameters.
The binder supply can stopmoderate severityThe supplier of the original binder stops making itSylvania discontinued PS-7, which threatened continued supply of Z-93, YB-71 and S13G/LO-1. The Air Force funded a reformulation with Kasil 2130 from PQ Corporation.

Side effects on surrounding parts

Side effects on surrounding parts
AffectsEffect
The Z-93 surface and neighbouring radiator panelsOutgassing and molecular deposits from nearby materials are the main contamination risk for the white coating. The 2008 report says durability holds for years in LEO provided materials selection, venting design and contamination control limit outgassing.
Nearby thermal control surfaces and solar array blanketsSilicone adhesive that erodes or is contaminated can darken nearby surfaces. The 1993 asher test showed that silicones exposed to atomic oxygen contaminated nearby samples.

Handling and storage

  • Application: Z-93 is applied by low-pressure, high-volume spray. The 1993 test used a thickness of 0.10 to 0.13 mm to reach the target optical properties.
  • The 1993 screening cycled samples 10 times between -93 C and +49 C in vacuum at about 0.013 Pa before testing, and measured optical properties before and after.
  • Potassium silicate coating SDS (a different product): wear protective gloves and eye protection, wash thoroughly after handling, and avoid breathing spray mist. Store locked up.
  • Zinc oxide SDS: collect spillage and dispose of contents to an approved waste disposal plant. Avoid release to the environment.

Mitigations

  • Measure solar absorptance in situ, or on the coupon before air exposure, in any ground VUV or atomic oxygen test. The 1993 authors state that this matters for white paints.
  • Block the samples from line-of-sight 130 nm VUV in an ECR beam with fused silica fixturing, so they receive scattered atomic oxygen only.
  • Control silicone and outgassing sources near the coating, as the 2008 report recommends for inorganic white coatings.

Supply and geography

How common the raw materials are and where they come from.

Zinc (feedstock for zinc oxide pigment)

USGS identifies world zinc resources of about 1.9 billion tons.

Top producers (2025)
China, Peru, Australia, United States
Recycling
USGS: refined zinc produced in the United States was recovered from secondary materials at both primary and secondary plants.
Substitutes
USGS: many elements are substitutes for zinc in chemical, electronic and pigment uses.

Potassium silicate binder (original PS-7 and replacement Kasil 2130)

Top producers (1995)
United States, United States
Recycling
Not stated in the sources read.
Substitutes
The 1995 report says Kasil 2130 has an identical SiO2:K2O mole ratio of 3.3:1 to PS-7, and PQ said production would continue indefinitely.

Updated