Aluminium gallium nitride AlGaN

AlxGa1-xN, an alloy of aluminium nitride (AlN) and gallium nitride (GaN)

Aluminium gallium nitride (AlGaN) is an alloy of aluminium nitride and gallium nitride, written AlxGa1-xN.

12 sources · Updated 2026-11-01 · CC BY 4.0

Evidence level

2 of 5

Lab-measured

Bandgap tuning

3.4 to 6.2 eV

Solar-blind cut-off

280 nm

Solar rejection

1000x

Quantum efficiency

48%

Recipe, share of the weight

  • Al not statedAluminium
  • Ga not statedGallium
  • N not statedNitrogen

Best for

Ultraviolet detectors that must ignore sunlight, such as solar-blind work below 280 nm (BAE Systems) and planetary UV instruments (NASA Goddard)

Weakest at

Few material constants for the alloy were found. The numbers here are mostly device results, and the cut-off figures differ between sources (see gaps)

Risk at a glance

  • People No data. No hazard data recorded
  • If it fails No data. No failure risks recorded
  • Corrosion No data. No corrosion data recorded

Quick facts: AlGaN

Key properties of AlGaN
PropertyValueBasis
Thermal conductivity165 to 187 W/(m·K)3 sourced values across conditions

What is the thermal conductivity of Aluminium gallium nitride (AlGaN)?

Aluminium gallium nitride (AlGaN) has a thermal conductivity of 165 to 187 W/(m·K). The range covers 3 sourced values across the tempers, forms and test conditions the sources report; room-temperature values are used where a source states a temperature.

What is Aluminium gallium nitride (AlGaN) used for?

Uses recorded in the sources include Back-illuminated solar-blind UV focal-plane array (256 x 256 pixels); UV detector for planetary missions; UV sensing instruments for plume, flame, lidar and bio-agent work.

Why it exists

Aluminium gallium nitride (AlGaN) is a semiconductor that can be tuned across the ultraviolet. NASA gives direct bandgaps of 3.4 eV for GaN and 6.2 eV for AlN, and the aluminium fraction sets the value in between. A detector that absorbs only below a chosen wavelength can ignore the visible and near-visible light of the Sun. NASA Goddard works on this family of detectors for next-generation ultraviolet planetary missions.

Where it's used

Solar-blind ultraviolet focal-plane arrays

A 2006 article describes BAE Systems' 256 x 256 back-illuminated AlGaN hybrid arrays, with an absorber that cuts off at 280 nm and a photosensitivity band of 260 to 280 nm.

Planetary ultraviolet detectors

NASA's abstract says AlGaN detectors can be designed to reject solar radiation 1000 times better than silicon detectors at a 325 nm cut-off.

UV sensing instruments

A NASA Tech Briefs article lists plume measurements, flame sensing, UV lidar, biological agent detection and airborne particle sizing as uses of AlGaN UV detectors.

Recipe

AlxGa1-xN, an alloy of aluminium nitride (AlN) and gallium nitride (GaN); x is the aluminium fraction

AlGaN is an alloy of aluminium nitride (AlN) and gallium nitride (GaN), written AlxGa1-xN. The aluminium fraction x sets the bandgap. The 2006 article says the detector layers were grown on 2 inch c-plane sapphire substrates.

What AlGaN is made of
IngredientShare of the weightWhat it does
Aluminium Al not stated Sets the bandgap. The NASA abstract gives 6.2 eV for pure AlN, the wide end of the alloy range.
Gallium Ga not stated Sets the bandgap. The NASA abstract gives 3.4 eV for pure GaN, the narrow end of the alloy range.
Nitrogen N not stated Bonds to the metal atoms in the nitride lattice. The sources read give no further detail.

Weight shares are as printed in the sources.

What it can do

Bandgap tuning

3.4 to 6.2 eV

measured

The NASA abstract gives direct bandgaps of 3.4 eV for GaN and 6.2 eV for AlN, the two ends of the alloy range. The bandgap of the alloy at a given aluminium fraction is not printed in the sources read.

Solar-blind cut-off

280 nm

measured

The 2006 article says an Al0.47Ga0.53N absorber gives a 280 nm cut-off, and that the array operates below 280 nm, the solar-blind band.

Solar rejection

1000x

measured

NASA gives 1000 times better solar rejection than silicon detectors at a 325 nm cut-off, and a NASA Tech Briefs article repeats the 1000x figure.

Quantum efficiency

48%

measured

The 2006 article gives a 48% peak quantum efficiency at zero bias for an AlGaN photodiode, and more than 50% at 270 nm.

How it compares

AlGaN covers a tunable part of the ultraviolet that GaN alone cannot, because the aluminium fraction moves the bandgap from the 365 nm GaN cut-off down toward the 200 nm AlN end (NASA abstract). Silicon is the reference for solar rejection: NASA gives 1000 times better rejection for AlGaN than silicon at a 325 nm cut-off. The sources read give no density or mobility for the alloy. The thermal conductivity and lattice values at x = 0.5 are first-principles calculations, so they are not ranked against measured values for other materials.

The same measurements for each material, so you can compare them. Each row names the key condition under the value; the full conditions and methods are in the numbered notes under Technical details.

Benchmarks
MeasurementAlGaN
Capacity and energy
Lowest nitrogen Frenkel pair formation energy, AlGaN with 25% Al6.57 eV17
Thermal behavior and safety
Thermal conductivity along [100], Al0.5Ga0.5N (first-principles)186.7 W/(m·K)13
Thermal conductivity along [001], Al0.5Ga0.5N (first-principles)165.2 W/(m·K)14
Thermal conductivity along [111], Al0.5Ga0.5N (first-principles)177.6 W/(m·K)15
Other measurements
Direct bandgap, GaN to AlN end members (alloy range)3.4 to 6.2 eV1
Tunable detection range of AlGaN alloys200 to 365 nm2
Solar-blind cut-off of the AlGaN absorber280 nm3
Short-wavelength edge of the photosensitivity bandCut-on wavelength printed in the article260 nm
Peak quantum efficiency at zero bias48 %4
Quantum efficiency at 270 nm> 50 %5
Quantum efficiency without reflection loss52.3 %6
Solar radiation rejection compared with silicon (NASA Tech Briefs)1000 x7
Cut-off wavelength of an AlGaN UV detector design (planetary)Cut-off printed in the NASA abstract325 nm8
Current responsivity at 360 nm, 0 VFigure printed in the NASA Tech Briefs article0.13 A/W9
Peak quantum efficiency at 360 nm, -0.5 VFigure printed in the NASA Tech Briefs article50 %10
Lattice constant a, Al0.50Ga0.50N (DFT)3.172 Å11
Lattice constant c, Al0.50Ga0.50N (DFT)5.101 Å12
Bulk modulus, Al0.5Ga0.5N (machine-learning potential)204 GPa16

Why choose it, and why not

Good for

  • Solar-blind ultraviolet detection, where the 2006 article reports operation below 280 nm.
  • Planetary ultraviolet instruments, where NASA reports 1000 times better solar rejection than silicon.

Watch out for

  • Sources disagree on the cut-off: 280 nm for the 2006 BAE Systems absorber and 325 nm for the NASA design. Both are printed.
  • The NASA Tech Briefs photodiode has a 365 nm cut-off, which matches GaN, so its numbers are for a different design.
  • No density, melting point, mobility or breakdown field for the alloy was found in any source read this run. The thermal conductivity and bulk modulus rows are first-principles or machine-learning calculations, not measurements.
  • The one failure entry is calculated, not tested: a nitrogen Frenkel pair energy from the machine-learning study, with no irradiation test on AlGaN read.

AlGaN is a tunable ultraviolet semiconductor whose bandgap range is documented at its two ends, 3.4 eV for GaN and 6.2 eV for AlN. The device numbers are results from detectors, and the alloy constants are calculated at x = 0.5, so the material data are still thin, with no measured density, melting point or mobility for the alloy found yet.

Technical details

For scientists and researchers. Everything above comes from the record below: every number with its method, its conditions and its source.

Notes

The method, full conditions and any caveat for the numbered rows above.

Notes for the numbered rows
#MeasurementMethodConditionsCaveat
1Direct bandgap, GaN to AlN end members (alloy range)Direct bandgaps printed in the NASA abstract for three nitrides, read as InN, GaN and AlN in that order; the 3.4 eV and 6.2 eV values are the GaN and AlN entriescomposition AlxGa1-xN from x = 0 (GaN) to x = 1 (AlN)temperature not stated in the abstractbasis end-member values from the abstract; the bandgap at intermediate x is not given in this source—
2Tunable detection range of AlGaN alloysRange printed in a 2006 trade article on AlGaN filter-free detection; the NASA abstract gives 200 nm for AlN and 365 nm for GaN as the matching endsbasis tunable direct-bandgap range quoted for AlGaN alloyscomposition AlGaN across the alloy range—
3Solar-blind cut-off of the AlGaN absorberCut-off wavelength printed in the article for the absorber layerabsorber Al0.47Ga0.53Ndevice back-illuminated AlGaN hybrid focal-plane array developed at BAE Systems, Lexington, MAoperation solar-blind, below 280 nmThe NASA abstract gives 325 nm for its AlGaN design (see the 325 nm row below). Both figures are printed; this profile does not choose between them.
4Peak quantum efficiency at zero biasPeak quantum efficiency printed in the article's detector performance paragraphbias zero biasdevice AlGaN photodiode described in the articlewavelength not stated in the fetched article text—
5Quantum efficiency at 270 nmPrinted as more than 50% at 270 nm in the articlewavelength 270 nmdevice solar-blind AlGaN array described in the article—
6Quantum efficiency without reflection lossCorrected figure stated by the article's authors; not a direct measurement in the sourcedevice UT diode described in the articlebasis figure the authors state would apply with no reflection loss—
7Solar radiation rejection compared with silicon (NASA Tech Briefs)Figure printed in the NASA Goddard Tech Briefs article dated October 1, 2010reference silicon-based detectorsbasis stated for AlGaN UV detectors in the NASA Tech Briefs article—
8Cut-off wavelength of an AlGaN UV detector design (planetary)—basis cut-off named in the same sentence as the 1000x rejection figurereference silicon-based detectorsConflicts with the 280 nm solar-blind cut-off printed in the 2006 article. Both are kept; no source reconciles them.
9Current responsivity at 360 nm, 0 V—wavelength 360 nmbias 0 Vdevice AlGaN UV PIN photodiode as described in the NASA Tech Briefs articleThe same article gives a 365 nm long-wavelength cut-off for this device, which matches the GaN value in the NASA abstract. The composition of this device is not stated, so it is not the 280 nm absorber.
10Peak quantum efficiency at 360 nm, -0.5 V—wavelength 360 nmbias -0.5 Vdevice same AlGaN photodiode as the 0.13 A/W responsivity rowSame device caveat as the responsivity row: its cut-off is printed as 365 nm.
11Lattice constant a, Al0.50Ga0.50N (DFT)DFT with the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) on the wurtzite cell, as stated in the paper's abstractcomposition Al0.50Ga0.50N (x = 0.5)structure wurtzitebasis density functional theory calculation in the paper, listed as Present Work—
12Lattice constant c, Al0.50Ga0.50N (DFT)DFT with the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) on the wurtzite cell, as stated in the paper's abstractcomposition Al0.50Ga0.50N (x = 0.5)structure wurtzitebasis density functional theory calculation in the paper, listed as Present Work—
13Thermal conductivity along [100], Al0.5Ga0.5N (first-principles)First-principles calculation of anisotropic thermal conductivity, printed in the paper's abstractcomposition Al0.5Ga0.5Ndirection [100]temperature 300 K—
14Thermal conductivity along [001], Al0.5Ga0.5N (first-principles)First-principles calculation of anisotropic thermal conductivity, printed in the paper's abstractcomposition Al0.5Ga0.5Ndirection [001]temperature 300 K—
15Thermal conductivity along [111], Al0.5Ga0.5N (first-principles)First-principles calculation of anisotropic thermal conductivity, printed in the paper's abstractcomposition Al0.5Ga0.5Ndirection [111]temperature 300 K—
16Bulk modulus, Al0.5Ga0.5N (machine-learning potential)Elastic constants and bulk modulus B from the machine-learning potential at the ground state, as printed in the papercomposition Al0.5Ga0.5N (x = 0.5), wurtzitebasis prediction from a machine-learning interatomic potential, labelled This work in Table I—
17Lowest nitrogen Frenkel pair formation energy, AlGaN with 25% AlMachine-learning interatomic potential calculation, as stated in the paper's text; not an irradiation experimentcomposition 25% Al (AlxGa1-xN, x = 0.25)defect nitrogen Frenkel pair (a vacancy plus an interstitial), lowest-energy configuration in the energy histogram—

Risks and side effects

Hazards to people, what happens when a cell overheats, and how the material is handled and stored.

For people

No safety data sheet or GHS entry for AlGaN itself was read. PubChem's GHS entry for the GaN end member gives H317, a skin sensitiser warning.

Dust
Handle wafers and powder with care until a supplier safety data sheet for the specific product has been checked.
Skin contact
PubChem's aggregated GHS entry for gallium nitride lists H317, may cause an allergic skin reaction, and signal word Warning.

Test details
The original wording and numbers from the sources, for readers who want them.

Failure risks

Failure risks
FailureTrigger and consequence
Nitrogen Frenkel pair defects in AlGaN under radiation or high temperatureIrradiation or high-temperature processing (calculated only; the paper does not test irradiation)The paper calculates that low-energy nitrogen Frenkel pairs exist in AlGaN, with the lowest at 6.57 eV at 25% Al, and states that under irradiation or high-temperature processing these configurations may form preferentially and dominate the early defect population.

Supply and geography

How common the raw materials are and where they come from.

Gallium

Top producers (2025)
China 99%
Critical mineral lists
US: listed, EU: listed
Recycling
USGS: old scrap recovery is none. Substantial new scrap from GaAs device manufacture was reprocessed to high-purity gallium at one New York facility.
Substitutes
USGS: in many defense-related applications no effective substitutes exist for GaAs and GaN.

Aluminium (USGS spelling: aluminum)

Top producers (2025)
China 60.8%, India 5.7%, Russia 5.3%, Canada 4.5%
Critical mineral lists
US: listed, EU: listed
Recycling
USGS: about 3.6 million tons of aluminum were recovered from purchased scrap in the United States in 2025.

Updated